• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home A-Clue

Is the Volcker Precedent Wrong?

by Dana Blankenhorn
September 23, 2022
in A-Clue, Always-On, business models, business strategy, Current Affairs, economy, energy, futurism, history, innovation, Internet, investment, Personal, Science, semiconductors, software, The 2020s and Beyond, The War Against Oil, Web/Tech, Weblogs
0
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Paul-volcker-1Fed chairman Jerome Powell is basing his anti-inflation fight on the success of Paul Volcker from 1979-1984.

The myth is Volcker sent interest rates higher than that era’s inflation, but the resulting recession set the stage for decades of growth to come.

What if it’s wrong?

I had already begun my reporting career in 1979. Volcker’s policy did cause pain. But interest rates didn’t start falling until the 1980s, and the Fed wasn’t the only cause.

The other cause was the State Department. In 1981 the Reagan Administration quietly negotiated an alliance with the Saud family based on a simple premise. They would sell oil in dollars and pump a lot of it. We would extend to them our military protection, specifically against Iran.

That alliance has held firm from that day to this. It held firm through the Gulf War. It held through 9/11, even though the attack was committed mainly by Saudi nationals and inspired by the son of a Saudi billionaire. It held through the disaster of Iraq.

It was this alliance that sent inflation down in the early 1980s, not Volcker’s Fed. Oil went from over $125/barrel to $80 in Reagan’s first term. Texas’ economy was crushed, but everyone else prospered. It was morning in America.

Our present inflation is also based on resources. Oil costs spiked from $80/barrel last September to over $115 in May. They’ve since fallen back to $80. The fall came about because we’re no longer in an economic era defined by resources.


Clouds by john blankenhornWe’re also no longer in an era where we need the State Department to win the inflation fight.

Today money rains down from the clouds. Tech stocks are hurting, but the best build on cash and cash flow, not loans. Technology delivers productivity, it delivers value, and this extends in every direction.

Technology already installed means our economy adjusts to change far more quickly than it did in the 1980s. Fed policy is designed to take effect in months and years. Tech lets businesses adjust on a dime. Economic changes regulate business behavior much faster than the Fed can.

Technology’s reach is extending now into those resources the war impacts directly. Solar energy now costs less than $1/watt. The price is continuing to fall while natural gas prices rise. The costs of wind energy also continue to fall. If you’re buying energy on a five-year contract, you’re a fool to buy fossil fuels.

Perovskite solar cellFossil fuel advocates like to harp on the cost of batteries and predict shortages of things like lithium-ion. But technology is developing alternatives, like graphene, which is just a form of carbon. Perovskites are finally coming to solar panels, and there are new windmill designs that won’t kill birds. This is what I wrote about 3 years ago as the End of Oil. It’s happening.

We’re already seeing declines in the price of commodities. Supply chains are loosening, so transport costs are going down. Consumers are becoming normal again. Win the war in Ukraine and our biggest problem becomes deflation, with a huge new opportunity to save money on food and water, again using new technology.

Technology can whip inflation now. If Powell pays attention to the data, he will realize this within a few months. Then you can worry about a “chip glut,” cheap silicon for cheap machines making the next boom bigger than the last.

Tags: 1980s2020sbusiness costsFederal Reserve. Paul VolckerinflationJerome Powellmonetary policyrecessiontechnologyVolcker
Previous Post

Government is a bank. Money is a verb.

Next Post

Too Much Winning

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
Too Much Winning

Too Much Winning

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

The Coming Labor War

The Insanity of Wealth

May 7, 2025
Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

May 5, 2025
Make America Dutch Again

Make America Dutch Again

April 30, 2025
Bikes and Trains

Opa Fiets is Depressed

April 29, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved