Dana Blankenhorn

Subscribe at Substack

This blog is now available at Substack, where you can subscribe to have it delivered to you. 

Bubbles Don’t Really Pop

History will record that the Trump Bubble burst on January 6, with a coup attempt organized by Donald Trump. (The picture is from Doc Searls' blog.)

I have seen many bubbles pop in my experience as a business reporter. The best-known was the dot-com bubble. It popped on January 10, 2000 when Time Warner announced it would “acquire” AOL.

The precise date of the popping is only remembered in retrospect. At the time, business went on. That spring I attended a trade show called ad:tech, on my employer’s dime. Even a year later I was able to take my wife on a trip to Hawaii because of an Internet commerce conference on the Big Island.

My most vivid memory of that ad:tech conference was on a bus, heading back to our hotel after a day spent on the water, sponsored by an Internet ad agency that eventually sank with the rest. A young entrepreneur was complaining that each new round of funding was requiring more equity from him and generating less cash. “It’s unfair,” he whined.

I’m a cruel man. I laughed until I cried. Later, at the event’s award show, a block “CNN” ad won awards for creativity. I laughed until I cried again. The people around me thought I’d gone crazy. It was just that I saw the handwriting on the wall.

The point is that even after a bubble pops, many people will remain unaware of it. They will continue to take the bubble as a real thing. They’ll go in even-deeper. They’ll consider falling prices an opportunity, telling folks to “buy the dip.”

Pay Per Day

There are days when I’m disgusted by my fellow journalists, and the whole journalism business.

This is one of those days.

While elite journalists bemoan the right-wing propaganda machine, seeing it as an existential threat to democracy and liberty, they’re defending an industry rapidly going behind paywalls. Nearly all daily newspapers are already there. Now the news services are doing. The latest is Reuters, which erected theirs this weekend.

The criticism is apt. The refusal to do anything about it is criminal.

There are things that can be done. I have been flogging the idea of “day passes” for some time.

Instead of demanding the commitment of a subscription, newspapers can offer day passes that let people behind the paywall for 24 hours or even less. When I tweeted this idea, however, a reporter for the Columbia Journalism Review specializing in digital journalism instantly dismissed it, calling it unworkable. (I felt like throttling the bastard.)

Amazon can make this work. Google can make this work. So could Microsoft or Apple. Heck, Facebook could make this work.

The True Cost of Bitcoin

If America’s enemies wanted to bury this country under energy costs, it could do worse than to have invented Bitcoin.

Greed has made Bitcoin the world’s energy sink. Bitcoin uses as much energy as the country of Argentina. Most of this new Bitcoin is being produced in China, leaving most of the country dependent on coal. It’s not just China being hurt. A Bitcoin miner in Montana, a former patent troll, is keeping a local coal-fired power plant operating. 

The waste doesn’t stop there. It costs about $25 million of electricity per day to run the Bitcoin network.  The current estimate for Bitcoin energy consumption this year is over 100 Terawatts.  And it’s not just Bitcoin. Every cryptocurrency is an energy hog. 

Some cryptocoin advocates, like Ethereum inventor Vitalik Buterin, admit the truth. He wants to change Ethereum’s algorithm so it uses less electricity.

But Buterin is in the minority. Most Bitcoin advocates claim what I just wrote is a myth. It’s supposed to use a lot of energy, at first, they claim. The existing transaction networks also use energy. Bitcoin’s use will drop once it replaces every other currency. Oh, and if you’re using hydropower or “excess” power from otherwise unused sources, what’s the harm? 

This is bullshit. Bitcoin isn’t a currency. Currency values remain relatively stable during a trade, otherwise they’re useless. Bitcoin is an asset, a global index of fear and greed.

Free TV is an Invisible Scandal

When TV was made digital to free up spectrum  stations were given “extra” channels in the new bandwidth, to do with as they wanted.

Something similar happened in the 1940s, and it made many fortunes. Big radio stations in major markets were literally handed new TV stations. If they also owned newspapers the bonanza was doubled. This was the foundation of Cox Enterprises, originally a newspaper chain founded by failed 1920 Presidential candidate James M. Cox.

The current transition is making no billionaires. In fact, it’s a scandal. A scandal no one is talking about.

Before the transition there was lots of talk about TV stations creating multiple channels with their new spectrum rights – news channels, cultural channels, ethnic channels. Instead, these rights have been sold or rented to a host of ad-based garbage programmers. Most stations just took the money and ran.

In Atlanta, for instance, there are channels running 1950s re-runs, a bunch of home shopping channels, foreign language channels, religious channels, even foreign channels. These are the kinds of channels that are too worthless to make it onto cable. There are also a lot of empty channels, or channels running the equivalent of radio. If you only have access to “free” TV (through a special antenna and, perhaps, a set-top box) you’ve been ripped-off. It’s not worth what you paid for the antenna.

The frequency spectrum is not supposed to be property. It’s not supposed to be a private slum. It’s supposed to be a public good. That was the idea of the Radio Act of 1926, and the Federal Communications Act that followed it. But this concept has been lost in our time.

If you want to make some meaningful change, demand we go back to that.