• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home A-Clue

Real vs. Real

by Dana Blankenhorn
January 25, 2022
in A-Clue, business strategy, Current Affairs, economics, economy, energy, innovation, intellectual property, Internet, investment, Personal, software, solar energy, The 2020s and Beyond, Web/Tech, WiFi, wind power
0
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

MARKET-CRASH-LIVE-780x470Analysts, and investors, are always fighting the last war.

The last war was the asset bubbles of the 1990s and 2000s. The first was in tech. The second was in housing.

Both fell after the bubble hit. Both times the government responded by juicing demand, first with the “forever wars,” then with a domestic stimulus and helicopter money.

Both times, this worked because the problem wasn’t related to what happened during the 1970s. Back then, resource inflation was to be feared. There was no substitute for oil. Now it’s just speculation and its aftermath.

The same kind of blow-off is happening now. There’s a fear that money will cost money, so speculators are pulling back, selling everything else to raise cash. (Cash is doing fine.) So far, it’s not nearly as bad as what came before. But fear is gripping the market because, this time, it’s accompanied by inflation.


Crash-man-head-downSadly, for the bears, this is not their kind of inflation. Except for oil, most resource prices are stable. The problem lies in “supply chains,” the networks of harvesting, factories, warehousing, and shipping that gets products to market.

Technology can address these problems. It’s already doing it. 

Today’s inflation was the product of COVID-19. COVID crushed demand, but in 2021 people began going out again and demand increased faster than supply. This was exacerbated by the continuing impact of COVID on workers, and by demographics. (We’re getting older, and many are retiring.)  

It’s a lot like the inventory recessions after World War II. Supply needed time to catch up after demand cuts. But it did. This was an era of enormous prosperity, thanks to the steadily increasing efficiency of manufacturing.

We’re in a different time. It’s technology that calls the productivity tune. As I’ve said here many times, the pace of change under Moore’s Law continuously accelerates. The benefits go partly to consumers, but mostly to stockholders, especially the largest stockholders, the founders and hedge fund managers who sponsor them.

Interior-Costco-storeMost of the problems caused by this are political, not economic. In terms of economics, this is all good. Demand for oil is headed down. For many other commodities there are ready substitutes. We’re harvesting energy from the Sun and the wind, not just bringing stuff up to burn like cavemen. The biggest problem is recycling. Not just money, but the waste we create when we consume things. We’re not paying enough to turn that waste back into goods and packaging.

In both cases the answer is the same. Stimulate demand. Create new tasks for the economy and technology will create viable solutions. Create new places to invest and money will get unstuck from wasteful speculation and flow toward what makes money.

For investors, this means you find some time over the next few weeks to buy some stocks. Buy the best companies, those whose sales and profits are growing. They’re cheap. They’re getting cheaper. These are the companies that will solve the inflation problem. Cloud companies, application providers, renewable energy companies, car companies and service companies. Anyone with control over their supply chain.

Productivity and efficiency, driven by Moore’s Law, will answer today’s economic problems. Then we can get back to the political ones.

Tags: dollareconomic historyinvestmentmarket crashMoore's Lawstock crashstock marketstockstech stockstechnology
Previous Post

Correction?

Next Post

What to Teach Journalists

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
What to Teach Journalists

What to Teach Journalists

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

The Coming Labor War

The Insanity of Wealth

May 7, 2025
Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

May 5, 2025
Make America Dutch Again

Make America Dutch Again

April 30, 2025
Bikes and Trains

Opa Fiets is Depressed

April 29, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved