• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home A-Clue

The Downside of Energy Abundance

by Dana Blankenhorn
January 5, 2021
in A-Clue, Current Affairs, economy, energy, futurism, solar energy, The 1981 Game, The 2020s and Beyond, The War Against Oil, wind power
0
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Empty oil drumThe first half of the last decade was marked by an energy gold rush.

Fracking made the USA energy independent for the first time in decades. Outside its impact on the environment, the boom was short-lived.

By 2014 demand was beating supply, and the boom has now turned to dust.

It wasn’t solar and wind power that killed the boom. It was efficiency and technology. LEDs require a lot less power than fluorescent bulbs. Intelligence added to warehouses and stores reduces the need still further. Insulation means you need less electricity for heating. New appliances are more energy efficient. The cloud is super-efficient, and the excess energy can be recycled. Laptop technology means this took less power to write than it would have then.

The oilpatch did its bit to kill the boom, too. There are now huge oilfields off South America and Africa that we didn’t know about before. The eastern Mediterranean gas fields have made Israel independent of Arab energy. Things like fracking and boiling the Alberta tar sands aren’t just environmentally destructive. They’re economically worthless.

All these things have put a thumb down on energy prices. That thumb is getting bigger over time. As I predicted in 2010 (based on Department of Energy research) we have now achieved “crossover,” the point where renewable energy costs less to exploit than fossil fuels. It’s hard today to justify a new natural gas plant. Soon, solar will cost less than gas fired in an existing burner.

The result is going to be another energy boom, this time a renewable energy boom.

But this one, too, has a sell-by date.


Wind turbine in trafficAs we saw in 2014, energy demand is finite. It’s not very elastic. The switch from running cars on gasoline to electricity will increase grid demand, but efficiency will continue to push demand down. Having goods shipped from warehouses to doorstops uses less energy than having everyone driving to stores, and trucks supplying those stores. Fleet efficiency goes directly to the owner’s bottom line, and they don’t care what their cars look like. Tens of millions of office workers will never leave their homes for work again. Clouds will become even more efficient users of energy than they are now. The Machine Internet will do the same thing for factories and cities.

We saw what happened in the last decade when the supply of renewable energy became greater than the grid wanted. Utilities just refused to take it. Some of that supply could now be off-loaded to produce “green” hydrogen (“blue” hydrogen is produced from natural gas) but demand for renewable power isn’t unlimited. It can grow, but it’s not unlimited.

IvanpahThis brings up the question, what might be retired first? What happens when the current boom is played out?

If you put solar panels on your roof at the height of the oil boom with a Power Purchase Agreement at that year’s price, I have bad news for you. You now own an expensive white elephant that may make your home harder to sell.

Efficiency drives out inefficiency. That’s true for renewable energy as it is everywhere else. Which brings up the second type of plant that may go bye-bye before it’s paid for.

These are utility-scale systems with high ancillary costs. The cost of transmitting power across the country is one such ancillary cost. Land is another. Solar and wind projects don’t cause the same problems as nuclear or coal plants, but utilities are situating them hundreds of miles from demand as though they do.

Solar-Panels-CottageAs with the home power example, inefficient systems will go away. I have always been suspicious about the Ivanpah Concentrated Solar Plant (CSP) in California, for instance. Thousands of mirrors covering thousands of acres, all focused on a central point so that the melted salt can give off heat overnight and thus produce some power when the Sun don’t shine. Then you must send that power hundreds of miles for it to be of use. Not all of it gets there. You have land costs, maintenance costs, it’s just not going to work long-term.

The point is that, before you invest in renewable energy today, you need to look ahead. You need to see if your costs are going to be competitive – all your costs – in 2030 as they are in 2021.

In an economics of abundance, such dangers accelerate. You have an example right in front of you. Your Windows XP machine from 1997 could, in theory, continue to work, but it’s in the landfill. So should be your 2005 iPod. They’re not just slow, they’re energy hogs.

It will be the same way with renewable power equipment.

I remember getting my first PC over 40 years ago. I had to borrow money to get it, and I had to write it off over time. Computers were capital equipment then. In 2021 even clouds are written down as they’re built, with cash flow instead of loans.

It will be the same way with renewable energy. Know that now, you’ll see where the mistakes were made later.  

Tags: economics of abundanceeconomyenergyenergy economicsfuturismrenewable energysolar powerwind power
Previous Post

Resources and the New Era: What the Best Futurists Got Wrong

Next Post

Stop Trumpism by Ending the Gerrymander

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
Stop Trumpism by Ending the Gerrymander

Stop Trumpism by Ending the Gerrymander

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

Game Changer

Game Changer

May 19, 2025
My AirBnB Trip

My AirBnB Trip

May 18, 2025
The Ride Back Home

The Ride Back Home

May 17, 2025
Bicycle Diplomacy Changing the World

Bicycle Diplomacy Changing the World

May 16, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved