• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home Crisis of 2020

Solving the Barrett Problem

by Dana Blankenhorn
October 27, 2020
in Crisis of 2020, Current Affairs, law, political philosophy, politics, The 1981 Game
0
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Joseph_Philo_BradleyThe problem of Amy Barrett is solvable.

You don’t have to increase the size of the Supreme Court. Congress can simply create an “emeritus” class of Supreme Court justices.

Any justice age 70 or over becomes “emeritus.” They no longer sit in the chamber during arguments. They no longer must live in Washington. They can advise during arguments, they can file briefs on cases, and they can act as District Court judges when needed. Richard Posner did this in the case of Apple vs. Motorola, telling both sides they had lost. Emeritus judges can also work on their legacies, something they can’t do now. They can take gigs at law schools, or at law firms.

Right now, 3 justices are 70 and over – Stephen Breyer, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito. Under this Judiciary Act of 2021 they would automatically go to emeritus status, with all the perks and opportunities that provides. Younger justices may also choose to retire early. I suspect a “former Supreme Court justice” can make a pile of coin.

Then you appoint replacements. Get two young progressives in for Thomas and Alito to balance the court. Maybe toss Republicans a bone and name Merrick Garland to the third seat.

This assures a steady flow of judicial appointments to every President. It means the court can be renewed continuously, as it should be. The idea of sitting for decades to scratch an ideological itch is ridiculous. A judge is not supposed to care who wins.

The authority of the President and the Congress in this matter is unquestioned. The first Supreme Court, under John Jay, had just 6 justices. Those jurists also had to “ride circuit,” hearing appeals. That’s why our regional appeals courts are called “circuit” courts. The current count of 9 came about in 1869, after Republicans had cut the number to 7, to keep Andrew Johnson from appointing any.  (That law also established the circuit courts.) 

This isn’t “court packing.” If anything, it’s court unpacking. If we get a solid Senate majority, I’m guessing some Republicans will support it. Then we go about increasing the number of District and Circuit court judgeships, to reduce the present backlog of cases. That’s how you balance those courts ideologically.

This is a quick, even fair way of making a one-time reform to the courts and reducing the ideological temperature. You’re appointed for life but go on emeritus status at 70, or whenever you feel ready. You remain useful in that position for life, able to discuss and dispose on legal issues as they come up.

Tags: After TrumpAmy BarrettBidenJudiciary ActlawreformSupreme Court
Previous Post

Biden’s Solar Problem

Next Post

Kamala and the Cloud Czars

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
Kamala and the Cloud Czars

Kamala and the Cloud Czars

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

The E-Transport Revolution Rolls On

Change the Subject, Atlanta

May 14, 2025
The Coming Labor War

The Insanity of Wealth

May 7, 2025
Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

May 5, 2025
Make America Dutch Again

Make America Dutch Again

April 30, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved