• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home A-Clue

Fixing Health Care

by Dana Blankenhorn
February 8, 2019
in A-Clue, Current Affairs, economy, Health, investment, law, medical, politics, The 1979 Game, The Age of Trump
2
0
SHARES
5
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Va-og-twitter-image (1)The key to fixing our broken health care system is deceptively simple.

Give those who collect the income firm control of the outgo. There is no such thing as an unlimited draw from a limited pool.

We know this works by looking at the market as it exists right now.

The Veterans Administration takes the biggest risks, people who’ve served our country. They come to the system with terrible problems, and they age out in terrifying ways. Yet the per-patient cost of delivering health care to these people is a fraction of the cost of our other delivery systems, because the government controls both income and the outgo.

The VA is a single-payer system. It gets its money direct from the government, it has a clear mission and requirement to treat people, and it can bargain for the best prices. VA hospitals aren’t fancy, many of the doctors are new to the profession, the staff is stressed, and the whole system is rickety, but it works. And when the Trump people try to privatize it, when they seek to destroy it, this will become very clear to all veterans, even those who would otherwise love them some Trump. They won’t love them some Trump, or any other privatization-mad Republican, ever again if he succeeds in destroying their VA.


Medicare logoMedicare and Medicaid also take risks the private insurance system won’t. Once I turn 65, next year, the private insurance system will know I’m going to die soon, and they won’t want to deal with me. Poor people, with lots of bad conditions and no ability to pay – dump ‘em.

But there are companies making a fortune treating these people, and at the low prices Medicare and Medicaid pay. Centene and Wellcare are just two of the companies prospering in this way.

What no insurer will tell you is that managed care, which is what Centene and Wellcare practice, is the hottest niche in the industry. Under managed care, the company that provides the insurance owns facilities, it controls drug disbursement, and doctors are employees like everyone else.

CenteneManaged care is profitable, in large part, because three-quarters of all our health care costs are for “chronic conditions,” preventable and manageable things like diabetes and heart disease. Regular check-ups, getting people to comply with doctors’ orders and take their medicine, is the key to keeping these costs down. Managed care companies keep their eye on these patients in ways insurers don’t.

Beyond this, putting doctors and everyone else on salary, building or renting low-cost physical facilities, and using technology to keep an eye on both doctors and patients, works. It’s small wonder that Amazon, JP Morgan Chase, and Berkshire Hathaway recently got together to form their own managed care company. Between them they have 1.5 million employees, so initial marketing costs are nil. Scaling up, in part through buildings these companies already own, delivering medicine through things like Amazon’s Pillpack, and using best practices as described by the group’s CEO, Atul Gawande, practically guarantees a fat profit.

Cvs-health-logoLetting people buy into these savings, letting them buy health care through the Medicare system, would be a great little bit of reform. We already know how popular managed care is, because those are the plans that “won” on the Obamacare exchanges. Putting a per-patient price on Medicare would do nothing but bring lower-risk patients into the system, improving its financial outlook.

People agitating to undo the mergers of CVS and Aetna, or of Express Scripts and Cigna, are missing the message of the market. Combining drug disbursement with insurance income is the next step in the reform process. Cigna and Aetna can’t hike prices willy-nilly, because they must compete in the market with United Healthcare, which beat Express Scripts in the market by buying Catamaran, a competing Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM).

Atul gawandeA PBM is a company that is charged by insurers and employers with bargaining for the best prices for drugs. They don’t really do this. Instead, they work with drug companies to create expensive “rebate” programs that pay off various players in the value chain and assure that the name brand drugs will be delivered, regardless of how much money must move through the system to make this happen.

PBMs are supposed to save money by bargaining on price and by making sure people take the drugs as prescribed, which reduces complications, especially on those chronic conditions that represent most of the cost. Turning them into units of insurers, which are focused on saving money to deliver competitive prices, is the best, fastest way of reforming them, because when the insurance bean-counters find their PBMs are costing them customers, things change.

This brings me to the real driver of health care costs, which is drug company greed.

I was hammered on the Twitter recently by an advocate of these people, claiming that any discussion in Congress of giving government researchers a taste of drug industry profits was illegitimate.

Drug pricesWhat’s illegitimate is refusing to let anyone in the U.S., even Medicare, bargain on drug prices, creating formularies that mandate low-cost prescriptions. That’s the present law. If it’s approved by the FDA, you must let it be prescribed by the doctor. It’s “keeping health care between the patient and the doctor,” never mind if the doctor’s been bribed by the drug company. The only authority that can bargain on price? The VA. That’s the real secret of their success in delivering low-cost care.

It would be easy, from a practical standpoint, to simply change the law, to allow Medicare, Medicaid, managed care providers and PBMs to bargain on drug prices as the VA does. This would drive prices down and the rapid expansion of the field, with multiple drugs becoming available for many conditions, would do the rest. Drug companies raise prices because they can. Someone in the marketplace must say they won’t pay.

Because of industry opposition to this simple reform, we find ourselves debating the nationalization of all health care, tearing down the entire insurance system in order to create a solution like one the VA already provides our bravest.

Prise_de_la_BastilleWe don’t have to do this, but public anger over the continuing rise of health care costs is such that it’s now wildly popular.

Opening the drug business to competition, so managed care can do its job, might seem an appropriate fallback position, but the fact is that Newton’s laws work in politics as everywhere else. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Trump’s depredations may make publicly-controlled health care the path of least resistance. You’re a veteran, you’re a veteran, everyone becomes a veteran!

This may be one of the greatest tragedies of the present tragic age, revolt looking more practical than reform, because those who normalized kleptocracy have lost all credibility.

Tags: drug priceshealth carehealth care reformmanaged careMedicaidMedicarenationalizationpoliticsTrumpVA care
Previous Post

The Google Primary

Next Post

The Streaming Crash of 2019

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
The Streaming Crash of 2019

The Streaming Crash of 2019

Comments 2

  1. Kathy says:
    6 years ago

    Very helpful article. Thanks for sharing.

    Reply
  2. Kathy says:
    6 years ago

    Very helpful article. Thanks for sharing.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

The Coming Labor War

The Insanity of Wealth

May 7, 2025
Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

May 5, 2025
Make America Dutch Again

Make America Dutch Again

April 30, 2025
Bikes and Trains

Opa Fiets is Depressed

April 29, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved