• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home A-Clue

21st Century Jeeves

by Dana Blankenhorn
August 21, 2009
in A-Clue, ADHD, economy, futurism, investment, Personal
14
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Think of this as Volume 12, Number 34 of A-Clue.com, the online newsletter I've written since 1997. Enjoy.


Jeeveswooster Recently Netflix sent us a classic comedy from 20 years ago, Stephen Fry (now a director) and Hugh Laurie (now House MD on Fox) starring in a true-to-the-book series of P.G. Wodehouse' Jeeves stories, called Jeeves and Wooster.

Laurie played Bertie Wooster, an upper class twit who thought he was smarter than he was. Fry played Jeeves, a "gentleman's gentleman" with the remarkable ability to get Bertie out of his self-made scrapes.

This got me thinking. How might someone deliver this value, or some portion of it, in the age of the Internet?

Even when Wodehouse was alive Jeeves was becoming antique. I don't need my pants pressed. I don't need my bath run. I can't afford to have someone else in my house taking care of me.

I am not alone in asking this. You may recall that the search engine Ask.com was originally called AskJeeves, the conceit being that it would deliver, not search results, but real answers to real questions. This same conceit powers Bing, Microsoft's new search engine. (Makes me wonder why Hope and Crosby didn't do a Jeeves series, with Hope as Wooster of course.)

There is a vast distance between a full-time, live-in butler like Jeeves and a software-driven online resource called Ask.Com. It occurred to me this morning that bridging this gap can spell opportunity.

When I first began my freelance career, in the early 1980s, I was close to Rob Aaron, who then made his living sifting through search engines to get real answers to people's business questions. He emphasized to me that a big part of his value add was interviewing clients to learn exactly what they were looking for, which was usually quite different from the question they were asking him to research.

For example. A lawyer might ask for an obscure fact on how much of a certain pollutant is being pumped into the local atmosphere. Close questioning would reveal the nature of the case they were working on, and the specific questions a series of search requests might answer that could lead to a courtroom victory of a settlement.

This is the kind of thing financial advisers claim to do (but seldom do), what primary care physicians would love to do (but don't have time to do), even what PR people claim for their clients (but seldom deliver).

Now consider how many millions of Americans are now operating , like me, as freelances, one-man bands with specific expertise. We may have mad skills for what we do, but we may lack other skills essential to success in business. Organization in my case. Perhaps follow-up. We don't have time to work on our business and we need that valuable service so we can work in our business.

Judy holliday Let's look at this through the eyes of another fictional construct, the 1950s show "Bells Are Ringing," starring the late, great Judy Holliday. She was working for an answering service, but her soul demanded she get involved in her clients' lives, which she transformed by giving them good advice in the role of a variety of characters.

Marry all this together and what do you have? I call it a 21st Century Jeeves. You may prefer to call it a shared secretary. You charge by the hour, just like a lawyer. You establish order. You follow-up. You learn what your clients need and either help them get it done or make sure you do it. You boost productivity by using your knowledge of computing combined with your knowledge of how bureaucracies work and your understanding of people.

How many clients could such a professional juggle at once? A pretty limited number, I would gather. You would need to have a car and a laptop, not an office. You would have appointments with clients, perhaps working at their home-offices for a few hours or a day at a time, and you would know where all the good WiFi coffeeshops were to act as your own offices.

In time you would need your own Jeeves, in order to scale your business. A central answering service would handle your scheduling, manage your payments, and let you work on clients' needs rather than getting lost in your own weeds.

But this can work. Start small. Call me. Especially if you live inside Atlanta, preferably on the east side, near Decatur. HELP!

Tags: Atlantabusiness opportunitycareersJeevesJudy Hollidaynew businessnew careersecretary
Previous Post

Free to Lie

Next Post

Can You Fight for Civility?

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
Can You Fight for Civility?

Can You Fight for Civility?

Comments 14

  1. Jesse Kopelman says:
    16 years ago

    I’ve often thought that the biggest mistake corporate America made was the wholesale elimination of the clerical class. You are now lucky if you get a single “admin” for an office of 20 or more. 40 years ago, the ratio was close to 1-to-1. I don’t understand why corporations think it is cost effective to have have highly paid white collar workers doing tasks that could be done just as well by people making not much more than minimum wage. One hour of many experienced white collar workers’ pay is equal to a whole day’s salary at minimum wage. Clearly we don’t need to return to the days of steno pools, thanks to technology, but we have gone too far in the other extreme — having highly paid workers do the most rudimentary tasks, because there is no one else to do them.

    Reply
  2. Jesse Kopelman says:
    16 years ago

    I’ve often thought that the biggest mistake corporate America made was the wholesale elimination of the clerical class. You are now lucky if you get a single “admin” for an office of 20 or more. 40 years ago, the ratio was close to 1-to-1. I don’t understand why corporations think it is cost effective to have have highly paid white collar workers doing tasks that could be done just as well by people making not much more than minimum wage. One hour of many experienced white collar workers’ pay is equal to a whole day’s salary at minimum wage. Clearly we don’t need to return to the days of steno pools, thanks to technology, but we have gone too far in the other extreme — having highly paid workers do the most rudimentary tasks, because there is no one else to do them.

    Reply
  3. Dana Blankenhorn says:
    16 years ago

    I hate to disagree with you.
    I find a lot more than minimum wage value in the job I described here. I think such a professional organizer can be a true professional, and earn a very handsome living.
    I think it’s important that we get rid of “low-value” employment and create more “high-value” employment, then train people to do it.
    Dana

    Reply
  4. Dana Blankenhorn says:
    16 years ago

    I hate to disagree with you.
    I find a lot more than minimum wage value in the job I described here. I think such a professional organizer can be a true professional, and earn a very handsome living.
    I think it’s important that we get rid of “low-value” employment and create more “high-value” employment, then train people to do it.
    Dana

    Reply
  5. Jesse Kopelman says:
    16 years ago

    I don’t think we really disagree. I wasn’t saying that a conceirge/butler was the same thing as a basic clerk or secretery. I was more making the point that we somehow went through a paradigm shift where are these positions were eliminated wholesale, without effecient alternatives taking their place. Doing everything oneself is inefficient, all the more so the more specialized one’s primary skill set is (which is the way the corporate world has been going for decades). I am all for replacing all unskilled employment with skilled employement, but first we must develop and implement both the alternative to unskilled labor and the new skilled positions.

    Reply
  6. Jesse Kopelman says:
    16 years ago

    I don’t think we really disagree. I wasn’t saying that a conceirge/butler was the same thing as a basic clerk or secretery. I was more making the point that we somehow went through a paradigm shift where are these positions were eliminated wholesale, without effecient alternatives taking their place. Doing everything oneself is inefficient, all the more so the more specialized one’s primary skill set is (which is the way the corporate world has been going for decades). I am all for replacing all unskilled employment with skilled employement, but first we must develop and implement both the alternative to unskilled labor and the new skilled positions.

    Reply
  7. 4 Stack says:
    12 years ago

    4 Stack

    Dana Blankenhorn: 21st Century Jeeves

    Reply
  8. mouse click the following website page says:
    12 years ago

    mouse click the following website page

    Dana Blankenhorn: 21st Century Jeeves

    Reply
  9. hanover ma realtors says:
    12 years ago

    hanover ma realtors

    Dana Blankenhorn: 21st Century Jeeves

    Reply
  10. Niki says:
    12 years ago

    Niki

    Dana Blankenhorn: 21st Century Jeeves

    Reply
  11. mouse click the up coming post says:
    12 years ago

    mouse click the up coming post

    Dana Blankenhorn: 21st Century Jeeves

    Reply
  12. ego cigarettes says:
    12 years ago

    ego cigarettes

    Dana Blankenhorn: 21st Century Jeeves

    Reply
  13. Colon Cleaner says:
    12 years ago

    Colon Cleaner

    Dana Blankenhorn: 21st Century Jeeves

    Reply
  14. Angelia says:
    12 years ago

    Angelia

    Dana Blankenhorn: 21st Century Jeeves

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

The Coming Labor War

The Insanity of Wealth

May 7, 2025
Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

May 5, 2025
Make America Dutch Again

Make America Dutch Again

April 30, 2025
Bikes and Trains

Opa Fiets is Depressed

April 29, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved