• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home Crisis of 2008

Battered Matthews Syndrome

by Dana Blankenhorn
January 10, 2008
in Crisis of 2008, Current Affairs, history, Internet, Television
0
0
SHARES
3
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Liberal bloggers continue to be apoplectic with rage over Chris Matthews "misogynistic" performance during this week’s New Hampshire primary.

Regular readers of this space had no such surprise. It’s what I’ve been saying for years now. A generation’s worth of political assumptions are exceedingly difficult to dislodge. In the case of the Nixon Thesis of Conflict,  it has taken the breaking of our military, our health care system, and our economy, based on obsolete assumptions that may have resonated in Spiro Agnew’s time , but are completely meaningless in the War Against Oil.

The result of being on the wrong end of those assumptions for a lifetime is, as in Matthews’ case, a form of Battered Wife’s Syndrome.  He claims to stand against those assumptions, and is fond of noting he is a former aide to the late, great Tip O’Neill.  But watching his boss get hammered, again-and-again, by Reagan-era conservatism, he became always on-the-lookout for the jerking of political knees on behalf of political jerks.

Chris_matthews_angry_fatherthumbnai
Until this year, this was the right way to bet. The only reason
George W. Bush got close to the Presidency, close enough to steal it
netroots Democrats will tell you, is because of those assumptions.
Those assumptions are often couched in a rather naked form of bigotry
as though their author, Nixon himself, were dictating to Matthews from
inside a bottle of Scotch.

The Swift-boating of John Kerry would have been ignored had they not
fit so nicely into those assumptions, about Vietnam-era protesters,
assumptions Democrats gleefully walked right into by nominating the
man.

When you’re battered like that politically, year after year, decade
after decade, it’s completely logical to see no other way of political
life. So Matthews and his Boston sidekick, Mike Barnicle, went
on-and-on with their naked display of prejudice — against feminists,
against blacks, against educated liberals, against the very idea of a
possible Democratic majority.

Given how 60,000 more voters opted for Democratic ballots in New
Hampshire than Republican, after an Iowa caucus where Democrats
outnumbered Republicans by nearly 2-1, it was simply too much. And this time, because the netroots had the numbers, the media heard.

This is an important turning point in American politics. Nominal Democrats
who assume the fetal position before Republican batterings are being
told by their fellow Democrats to STFU. They’re being called out for
what they are, co-dependents. They’re being given an intervention, told
that if they don’t get help for themselves the family will wash its
hands of them.

With many women, and some men, this is all it takes. They go to the
sheriff, they get a lawyer. They divorce the bastard. For others, and
I’m afraid Matthews is one of them, they just go nattering on until
they are, in effect, killed.

Or in this case, cancelled.

Matthews is acting like a battered woman. That’s the irony here. That’s
the funny bit. Merely feeling sorry for him is just enabling his
batterer. If the victim refuses all help, you shake your head and leave
them alone.

And this goes for the rest of you. Next time some gun nut, or economic royalist, or chickenhawk,
or pro-slavery maniac tries to intimidate you, tries to politically
rape you, attacks you, you kick him (or her) . In the nuts. Then you do
it again. And again. Until they get the message.

Your time is over. Your day is done. We’re not afraid of you any more.

I am Democrat. Hear me roar.

Tags: 2008 electionChris MatthewsHillary ClintonMSNBCNew Hampshire primarypolitical coverageTV
Previous Post

Message from New Hampshire

Next Post

The Difference Among Democrats

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
The Difference Among Democrats

The Difference Among Democrats

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

AI is a Tool

AI is a Tool

May 22, 2025
The E-Transport Minority

Twilight of the Bike-y Bike

May 21, 2025
The Ultimate Scam

The Ultimate Scam

May 20, 2025
Game Changer

Game Changer

May 19, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved