• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home Current Affairs

ObamaRomney

by Dana Blankenhorn
December 11, 2007
in Current Affairs, futurism, history, political philosophy, politics, The 1967 Game
0
0
SHARES
3
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

George_romney_time_cover
A few weeks ago, I wrote a piece called Let Obama Be Reagan.

The idea was that Barack Obama has a chance to represent the new Internet Thesis of American politics, the values of consensus, openness, transparency, connectivity and standards that define how we must approach our current problems, the values separating us from the TV past. Just as Reagan embodied the Nixon-era values of  conflict, drama, personality, and showbiz.

Now that we’re at the key point in this race, with the Democratic nomination (and the Presidency) on the line, I’m afraid Obama is starting to make the mistake another candidate from 1968 made, to his eternal peril and family’s torment.

That candidate was Romney. George Romney. Mitt’s dad.

Barack_obama_time_cover
A little over 40 years ago, George Romney was on his way to being President, and Mitt was on his way to becoming a Republican Kennedy kid. Then he made a famous, or infamous mistake. He said one word.

Brainwashed.

This screwed Romney good, but the reason it screwed him has only become clear in the light of history. Romney said he’d been "brainwashed" about Vietnam by the Johnson Administration as a nod to Vietnam War opponents.

But the rising thesis of that time, the new assumptions of the emerging Republican majority, held that Vietnam, as a Cold War Activity, was not open to question by those seriously seeking power. Bugging out, to these voters, was not an option.

Donniemcclurkin
It’s an easy mistake to make. When new assumptions are rising, and
everything seems in play, the popular move appears to be a nod to
the old order’s followers, as they exit stage left (or right in this
case). This is what the press is crying for. This is what Joe Klein and
Deborah Howell and Chris Matthews and Wolf Blitzer and all the other avatars of the old
order are demanding.

This is what they call "bipartisanship."

But it’s not bipartisanship. To those of the new, rising order it’s
nothing less than political appeasement. When the people who have ruled
over you and proven their incompetence come looking to you for
validation, the new order says, you kick them in the teeth. Then you
put your foot on their neck.

Paul_krugman
Obama isn’t making this mistake with one grand gesture, as Romney the Elder did. He’s doing it in bits and pieces, with nods and winks. He attacks Paul Krugman. He embraces Donnie McClurkin. As Digby writes at Hullaballoo, he’s Sister Souljah-ing the left, just like Bill Clinton did 16 years ago, knowing that in the end they have no alternative but to follow the nominee.

He’s triangulating. And against the master triangulator.
It’s like trying to out-Nixon Nixon, to be Nixon with a smile. Which
pretty much defines the Elder Romney’s whole 1968 campaign.

What does he get from this? Obama is now the most popular Democrat
among Republicans, especially evangelicals. They feel they’ll get a
fair hearing from Obama, that they will be embraced as brothers and
sisters at the White House, not given the cold shoulder they fear the
Clintons would give them, or the outright banishment a John Edwards
would dish out. (Nor the Nuremberg Trial  they deserve.)

Max_baer_jr_as_jethro_bodine
It’s a very delicate balancing act, conducted at a moment when such
balancing is completely unnecessary. Americans reject the Bush-era
assumptions every single Republican candidate for President (and nearly
every other office) embraces fully. Mike Huckabee just puts a Beverly
Hillbillies gloss on it. It will soon become clear he’s not Jed —
he’s Jethro. Wanting to jam with Keith Richards is like Jethro’s dream of being a "double-naught spy."

Words have power, which is what Howie Klein tries to say here,
using the great words of Tom Stoppard to point out that how we argue
our points is as important as the points themselves. Obama might indeed
argue that, saying that his nods to the right are mere symbolism, his
aim is to bring evangelicals and other Republicans along toward
progressive themes, that he is building a new kind of politics based on Internet-era values, without reference to the past. Which is what Americans say
they want. Which is indeed what they want.

The risk is that Democratic voters, especially Iowa caucus-goers, start to see Obama as just another triangulating politician. Just another Democrat.

That would be fatal.

Tags: 2008 campaign2008 Democrats2008 electionBarack ObamaClintonGeorge RomneyInternet ThesisJethro BodineNixonNixon ThesisPaul Krugmanpoiltical strategytriangulationTV Thesis
Previous Post

Chicken, Meet Egg in The War Against Oil

Next Post

The Reckoning

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
The Reckoning

The Reckoning

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

The Coming Labor War

The Insanity of Wealth

May 7, 2025
Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

May 5, 2025
Make America Dutch Again

Make America Dutch Again

April 30, 2025
Bikes and Trains

Opa Fiets is Depressed

April 29, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved