• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home censorship

The Seduction of Don Imus

by Dana Blankenhorn
April 10, 2007
in censorship, Communications Policy, Current Affairs, entertainment, ethics, journalism, politics, Television, The 1967 Game
2
0
SHARES
3
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

UPDATE: More here.

The Don Imus Kerfluffle means nothing until you understand the nature of his act.

It’s a sex act. And it’s not love-making.

Imus has spent the better part of two decades now portraying a female porn star on morning radio. (What else is a 66-year old man doing with brown hair down to his shoulders?)  Producer Bernard McGuirk, and newsreader Charles McCord play the male parts. They surround him, they tease him, they goad him, they needle him, they taunt him, and they giggle in that "heh heh" way men do around women they’re about to "do."

They are, in effect, abusing and harassing him, just as women are verbally abused and harassed every day — in bars, in offices, in schools, or on the street.

The "sex," in this case, is some inane outburst like the one which got Imus into trouble last week. Say something racist, Imus, say something sexist, they taunt. Oh no, he chuckles, you’re going to get me into trouble. C’mon Imus, you know you want to. You want it as bad as we do. And it finally comes out. At which point they all laugh — McGuirk, McCord, Imus, the audience. They’re all in on it. If you listen, or watch, you’re in on it too.

To make it more entertaining, they bring in "guest stars," straight reporters and politicians who are usually the targets of Imus’ act. They take his verbal bukkake and in so doing, legitimize it for the rest of the audience, which mentally gets off on what he’s saying, and the fact he’s getting away with it, and the fact the producer is getting away with it — heh heh heh.

You take away what Imus calls "comedy" and you have nothing. That’s the whole act — the goading, the tittering, the climax. At the heart of it all has always been the guys around Imus, the ones who set him off. Notice that one of him is his producer.

Jenna_jameson_dsc_0138
(Picture from Wikipedia.)

This is ritualized sexual abuse, which they play on Imus, which Imus
then plays on us, which the media legitimizes, and which millions of people
take with their morning coffee. It’s the perfect accompaniment to New
York traffic, where sons-of and damned-yous of every sex, race, age, and
ethnicity cut you off in traffic, make you late, and abuse your last
nerve. What better way is there to get through such an experience,
every morning, than to listen to other people get abused, to laugh at
how ugly and stupid and worthless they are.

The only way for you to feel worthwhile is to feel others are worthless. That’s the heart of the problem. The enemy isn’t Imus. It’s the Imus in all of us.

This really didn’t come into focus for me until I read about yesterday’s Al Sharpton show.
(No, I didn’t know Sharpton had a radio show before, either.) Imus was abasing himself. He called himself "an old cracker." And
Sharpton called him on it. It was like hearing the female porn star
call herself a whore and watching the preacher try to say, no, you’re
not, you don’t have to be that way, you shouldn’t be that way.

But like Jenna Jameson, Don Imus has no other way. He has no other act. That’s the tragedy.

The fault for it, for all of it, lies with us, and within us. This could not be revealed until the political calculus changed so that revealing this truth, holding up the mirror to the audience, was possible. As long as such  "frat boy humor" was legitimate, from Washington city to Long Island City, and criticism of such humor was illegitimate, Imus was golden. But times have changed.

And now that this job is done, we have an opportunity, a responsibility really, to do more than throw Don Imus aside. We need to look inside ourselves, at what we found so funny in Imus’ act, in the racism and sexism and ageism and etc.-ism we use to get through our day and make ourselves feel worthy.

Is that necessary? And if it’s not, if such abuse is truly beyond the pale, are we going to accept it anywhere else? Will we continue to accept it from Bill O’Reilly, from Rush Limbaugh, from Fox & Fiends, from all the rest of them?

Summer_of_love_poster
Or are we finally going to change the channel and say, no, we’re better than that. Sex is love, not violence. Comedy is universal, not exclusive. And our choices should reflect that.

This is all part of The 1967 Game. Back then the bulk of the American people made some hard decisions about what they considered legitimate, and illegitimate.

The illegitimate — the sex, the drugs, the hippies — were marginalized. It took time — they’re still most of what we think about when we think about that time — but there were marginalized. And every attitude they had was marginalized. But we’ve gone too far in that direction. We’ve gone from the "Summer of Love" to this "Springtime for Hitler." And it’s time to turn back.

Time to marginalize the haties.

Tags: Al SharptonCable NewsDon ImushatieshatredHullaballooImus in the MorningMSNBCpornradioRutgerssexual abuseTV
Previous Post

ICANN Fleeing Bush Internet Coup

Next Post

Destroying Net Neutrality, Piece by Piece

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
Destroying Net Neutrality, Piece by Piece

Destroying Net Neutrality, Piece by Piece

Comments 2

  1. partly true says:
    18 years ago

    Decent people stoop to laughing at talk like Imus’ also because of the buildup of taboo toward anything that violates Identity Politics Correctness and interferes with the moral preening of the rule-makers.
    Imus’ comment was beyond the pale, but the license to violate these prim prescriptions lies in those roles. People, and not bad people, have put it there, because somewhere they long to say, straight out, that the Emperor we are being asked to worship is buck-naked, is made right queasy about liberty and the Bill of Rights. That extreme ascribed equality isn’t. That some are free to speak, and others are boo-ed: “Oppressor! Lacrosse Player!” That Feelings is becoming the new national anthem.
    When the mass of people have been warned that their perceptions and concerns had better stay bottled up, they will root for even a corrupt champion to speak freely.
    Along with the relief of saying out-of-bounds things, and the private-public vulgar playfulness you describe, Imus was implicitly slurring and satirizing the rap culture, and its strivers too dishonest or greedy to disavow it. I defy a postmodernist literary critic to outlaw that reading of the “text.”
    Much of your post is accurate, but prescribing ever-higher “niceness” standards (change the channel and say, no, we’re better than that) without addressing the lies in which we live by fiat, will make matters worse, looking at the whole system.

    Reply
  2. partly true says:
    18 years ago

    Decent people stoop to laughing at talk like Imus’ also because of the buildup of taboo toward anything that violates Identity Politics Correctness and interferes with the moral preening of the rule-makers.
    Imus’ comment was beyond the pale, but the license to violate these prim prescriptions lies in those roles. People, and not bad people, have put it there, because somewhere they long to say, straight out, that the Emperor we are being asked to worship is buck-naked, is made right queasy about liberty and the Bill of Rights. That extreme ascribed equality isn’t. That some are free to speak, and others are boo-ed: “Oppressor! Lacrosse Player!” That Feelings is becoming the new national anthem.
    When the mass of people have been warned that their perceptions and concerns had better stay bottled up, they will root for even a corrupt champion to speak freely.
    Along with the relief of saying out-of-bounds things, and the private-public vulgar playfulness you describe, Imus was implicitly slurring and satirizing the rap culture, and its strivers too dishonest or greedy to disavow it. I defy a postmodernist literary critic to outlaw that reading of the “text.”
    Much of your post is accurate, but prescribing ever-higher “niceness” standards (change the channel and say, no, we’re better than that) without addressing the lies in which we live by fiat, will make matters worse, looking at the whole system.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

Game Changer

Game Changer

May 19, 2025
My AirBnB Trip

My AirBnB Trip

May 18, 2025
The Ride Back Home

The Ride Back Home

May 17, 2025
Bicycle Diplomacy Changing the World

Bicycle Diplomacy Changing the World

May 16, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved