• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home business strategy

Ritter’s Gamble in War Against Oil

by Dana Blankenhorn
March 28, 2007
in business strategy, economics, energy, environment, geothermal, regulation, solar energy, The War Against Oil, wind power
2
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Xcel_banner_windmills

Democratic Governor Bill Ritter of Colorado signed two major renewable energy bills yesterday.

You would think I would be happy. Worried is more like it.

The problem is that the bills he signed amount to a subsidy for Xcel Energy with no requirement of fundamental change. The idea of the first bill is that Xcel will tap more wind and geothermal energy, maybe build some big solar projects, and pump that electricity  into its existing systems. The second bill subsidizes Xcel’s replacement of high power lines, allowing them to be written off quickly.

This is an enormous win for Xcel. But is it sound policy in the War Against Oil?

I’m not certain it is.

If you are going to write the utility a huge check, you should be able
to make some demands in return. Demand that Xcel buy back power
consumers and businesses create for themselves, at market prices.
Demand that Xcel’s local networks be engineered to handle this. Demand
that Xcel build-in a hydrogen cycle, taking excess power off the grid
in the form of hydrogen, and at least having that available for use by
fuel cells in time of need.

You also need guarantees when you subsidize a big utility. All the
customer subsidies given to Verizon, AT&T, and other phone
companies over the last 10 years, predicated on the idea of building-in
faster broadband for everyone, were in fact pocketed, used for
acquisitions. The networks are no better than they were, and the money
— $200 billion — is all gone.

Finally, there is nothing in either of these bills which creates a
competitive energy market. It’s all monopoly subsidy. If someone other
than Xcel can produce renewable power, or distribute it, for less than
Xcel’s bureaucracy, they still can’t get into the market under this
legislation.

The electricity component of the War Against Oil requires that we completely re-think how electricity works:

  • It doesn’t have to be produced in huge plants.
  • It doesn’t have to be a monopoly product.
  • It doesn’t have to be a one-way street.

Ritter may have missed an opportunity to do some really big things in
his rush to grab a quick headline, and fulfill a campaign promise. Time, of course, will tell. How will
Colorado regulators hold Xcel to its promises? How will Xcel deliver?
What happens in the case of failure? All these questions are unanswered.

The War Against Oil can’t just be a rush to subsidize war profiteers, or it will end no better than our adventure in Iraq.

Tags: Bill RitterColoradoenergy subsidiesgeothermal energyrenewable energysolar energyThe War Against Oilwind energyXcel Energy
Previous Post

Olbermann’s Ooops

Next Post

Bush Is Not The Problem

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
Bush Is Not The Problem

Bush Is Not The Problem

Comments 2

  1. Jesse Kopelman says:
    18 years ago

    I agree. I think the problem we need to address is that our current system of inconsistent partial regulation of infrastructure concerns is giving us the worst of both socialism and capitalism. Unfortunately, the nature of bureaucratic systems is such that they have to completely fail before it becomes obviously worth the trouble to fix them.

    Reply
  2. Jesse Kopelman says:
    18 years ago

    I agree. I think the problem we need to address is that our current system of inconsistent partial regulation of infrastructure concerns is giving us the worst of both socialism and capitalism. Unfortunately, the nature of bureaucratic systems is such that they have to completely fail before it becomes obviously worth the trouble to fix them.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

The Coming Labor War

The Insanity of Wealth

May 7, 2025
Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

May 5, 2025
Make America Dutch Again

Make America Dutch Again

April 30, 2025
Bikes and Trains

Opa Fiets is Depressed

April 29, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved