• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home Broadband Gap

Washington vs. The Roots

by Dana Blankenhorn
July 8, 2006
in Broadband Gap, Communications Policy, Current Affairs, futurism, Internet, network neutrality, open source, Personal, politics
0
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

French_revolution
One reason generational patterns repeat is that Washington ignores history.

Reporters "go native" on their Washington sources, internalize the assumptions of the people they cover, and treat new movements with the cynical contempt of castle lords facing a plebeian rabble.

Some 40 years ago conservative Republicans were being lectured to by their Washington party that they were too doctrinnaire, that they were too extreme, that they should follow their leaders if they wanted power, and would never win if they demanded orthodoxy.

So the parting on the right is now a parting on the left, and it’s the Netroots who are being lectured in the same way. The response to that lecture should be clear.

Netroots to Blogometer: We’re not your monkey.

How dare you, in your comfy Washington office, lecture people in the field over who they must support! How dare you state baldly that unless the Netroots continue sucking up to the Joe Liebermans of the world they have no chance of ever achieving anything? The circular logic of that is amazing. If you support real change you will never get it. Go Cheney yourself!

Much of this ignorance is built on the fact that the Washington party refuses to see the differences between Netroots Democrats and Washington Democrats. The Blogometer calls them "angry activists ready to go out and vote for anyone with a "D" after their name."  This is simply not true. The campaign against Lieberman makes this clear.

So let’s ask the key question:

What do the Netroots want?  What do the Netroots demand?

Bob_frankston_5
Mainly, we want attention paid to the real world, not the
Washington world. We demand that leaders address such things as global
warming, the replacement of hydrocarbons, the economic competition from
China, India and Brazil. We demand that America embrace the future,
starting with this medium. We demand more bits, more communication,
more openness.

This is at the heart of Open Source Politics. It’s an
intuitive understanding that this medium, and its values of connection,
transparency, and consensus, are a new paradigm that must prevail
before we can move forward. It is telling that both Right Blogistan and
Left Blogistan stand together on issues regarding the Internet, not
just net neutrality (a Washington phrase) but on the demand that these
networks be defined at the edge, not at the center.

Why do Washington editors and consultants insist on lecturing us? Because they know, very
well, that we’re not just against specific politicians. We’re against
the whole idea of a center insulated from the edge. We’re not going to
take it anymore, from the TV talking heads, from the cable talking
heads, from the newspaper talking heads, and certainly not from the
National Journal. We demand more responsiveness fron the center, not just in 2006 but going forward.

It’s going to be messy, in part because the Netroots’ philosophy is
more about the process of change than about specific policies, as it
was in the Goldwater era. But that’s the way it is when you’re working
on a new political myth.

The Lamont-Lieberman race is merely a symptom of something larger. It’s
not just about the policies of the moment, but the processes by which
people achieve power in Washington, and what they must do afterward to
deserve it.

Tags: 2006 electionBlogometerInternet politicsInternet valuesJoe LiebermanLamont-LiebermanNational JournalNed LamontNetrootsnetwork neutralityopen source politicspolitical myth
Previous Post

Headlines for July 7, 2006

Next Post

There’s Not Enough Us

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Next Post

There's Not Enough Us

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

Why Do I Hate Medill so Much?

Why Do I Hate Medill so Much?

December 4, 2023
Big AI, Little AI

AI and the Death of Writing

November 30, 2023
A Retailing Ghost Story

A Retailing Ghost Story

November 28, 2023
AGI is the Lie of the Year

AGI is the Lie of the Year

November 27, 2023
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved