• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home Broadband

We Don’t Need No Steenkin’ Bells

by Dana Blankenhorn
June 8, 2006
in Broadband, Broadband Gap, business strategy, Communications Policy, Competitive Broadband Fiber, Internet, network neutrality
2
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Dave_burstein
All our present Internet troubles — the bit-hoarding and net neutrality — could begin to disappear if cable operators simply do what they’re now promising, and deliver more two-way bandwidth. (Which is what other countries have.)

Dave Burstein (left) of DSL Prime is right. The maximum speeds of ADSL are abysmal, next to the promises of cable, and with the Bells moving toward IPTV, those won’t increase. 

When you get right down to it, the Bells’ attempt to get into TV is just another way of avoiding any increase in DSL speeds. Which is a hole you can drive a train through.

As Burstein told Business 2.0 recently "Comcast head honcho Brian Roberts is betting that the cable giant will go “50
meg down, 15 meg up pre-DOCSIS 3.0…in selected markets” by 2007." Compared to that, DSL at 1.5 Mbps is "so last century."

Maybe Dave’s letter will have to become DOCSIS Prime. Not a problem. We’ll always need great journalists like Dave. But the Bells? Who needs them?

Assuming cable chooses to let loose the bits, breaking the TV barrier on the speed it makes available to customers, it will gain market share, and the Bells will lose even-more subscribers. After all, why keep a phone line when cable can do everything the phone can? The Bells are already losing share to wireless. Now you have a second drain.

And in the face of that, the Bells will have no choice but to add speed, or (at the very least) implement true net neutrality with high throughput as a way to hold what share they have. A cable monopoly would allow it to degrade video signals competing with its base service, and in that case a Bell action allowing video — even encouraging Internet video —  would be their only choice.

Or, they could die.

Which would not be a bad deal.

Tags: AT&TBellsbroadband speedscable modemComcastDave BursteinDSLDSL PrimeInternet broadbandOm MalikVerizon
Previous Post

What China Most Fears

Next Post

The Meaning of the House Vote

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Next Post

The Meaning of the House Vote

Comments 2

  1. Jesse Kopelman says:
    18 years ago

    Tech-wise the Bells aren’t in that terrible shape. The money it would cost them to upgrade their network to cable competing speeds is no more than Cingular or Verizon Wireless spends in a single year. The problem is that the land line parents don’t get the slack that their wireless children do from Wall Street. They got their big chance to prove that they could make money by offering new services back in the 90s and blew it by sitting on their hands until cable forced them to move. Now, no one wants to put up the cash to give them a second chance.

    Reply
  2. Jesse Kopelman says:
    18 years ago

    Tech-wise the Bells aren’t in that terrible shape. The money it would cost them to upgrade their network to cable competing speeds is no more than Cingular or Verizon Wireless spends in a single year. The problem is that the land line parents don’t get the slack that their wireless children do from Wall Street. They got their big chance to prove that they could make money by offering new services back in the 90s and blew it by sitting on their hands until cable forced them to move. Now, no one wants to put up the cash to give them a second chance.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

Why Do I Hate Medill so Much?

Why Do I Hate Medill so Much?

December 4, 2023
Big AI, Little AI

AI and the Death of Writing

November 30, 2023
A Retailing Ghost Story

A Retailing Ghost Story

November 28, 2023
AGI is the Lie of the Year

AGI is the Lie of the Year

November 27, 2023
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved