• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home Communications Policy

Visions of Net Neutrality: Michael Calabrese

by Dana Blankenhorn
April 3, 2006
in Communications Policy, network neutrality, open spectrum
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

From today’s Freedom2Connect Conference in Silver Spring, Maryland.

Michael_calabreseMichael  Calabrese, New American Foundation, VP

I’m going to talk about the TV channels.

It’s pending in Congress. It’s a proceeding Michael Powell initiated, that the current chairman is sitting on. This is not about channels 52-69 – those 18 channels are going to auction, with 4 for public safety. This is about 294 of the very best megahertz of airwaves around. Most of it, at the end of 2009, will be empty. The vacancy rate ranges form 30% to 75% in small markets.

The good news is there’s now legislation with the backing of a majority of the Republicans on the Senate Commerce Committee  — one bill from Stevens, another from Senators Sununu, Kerry and Boxer.

There are four reasons to consider this the trunk of the elephant.

1. Experiment with the commons. Give a mixed regime
2. Rocket fuel for WISPs and munis
3. A hedge against erosion of net neutrality
4. Efficiency for pervasive connectivity

It’s our best chance for a commons, and a mixed regime combining
licensed and unlicensed will be the msot efficient, the most
competitive, the best way to promote deployment. This requires
unlicensed in a range of frequencies. Today there is very little
unlicensed spectrum in the lower frequencies, where the cost goes down
and coverage increases. Only 129 megahertz are available below 3 GHz.
If we can get it in the TV band, intact, we can create a national
specturm park. TV over the air is dieing.

The second is rocket fuel. Low frequency spectrum lowers deployment costs 3-4 times, it improves coverage.

It’s critical for the digital divide, very low cost connectivity.

In three years, AT&T’s goal is that in 3 years half their territory
will not have anything better than today’s DSL, except they’ll partner
with the Dish network and connect through a set top box. Presumably
those will be the lowest income. 40% of this territory will have 25
Mbps, but 19 walled off for video. The remaining 2-5 mbps will be
divided between a fast and slow line.

Wireless can put a work around, facillitate peer to peer, and support
net neutrality. Why go through the cell tower? It’s a billable moment.
If you don’t have a middle man you can do it direclty. It also
encourages Internet localism.

The final reason is efficiency. Spectrum efficiency is very important.
We ought to put property rights where they belong. The way you get more
spectrum use – 98% of the last spectrum use has come by cell division.
As cells get close to the person, why pay the middle man? Shouldn’t
property rights be associated with access to the airwaves, in your own
home and business? Third party property rights don’t make sense in a
world of pervasive connectivbity through low powered mesh devices.

Previous Post

Visions on Net Neutrality: DeWayne Hendricks

Next Post

Visions of Net Neutrality: Rick Ringel

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Next Post

Visions of Net Neutrality: Rick Ringel

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

Life After SEO

Life After SEO

December 6, 2023
Why Do I Hate Medill so Much?

Why Do I Hate Medill so Much?

December 4, 2023
Big AI, Little AI

AI and the Death of Writing

November 30, 2023
A Retailing Ghost Story

A Retailing Ghost Story

November 28, 2023
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved