• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home Communications Policy

The Battle of Wyoming

by Dana Blankenhorn
February 2, 2006
in Communications Policy
0
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Wyoming_mapRecently, Level 3 Regulatory Counsel Erik Cecil brought former FCC official Dale Hatfield to Wyoming in order to fight a Qwest effort to gain a virtual monopoly on Internet backhaul in that state. (Wyoming map from Wikipedia.)

Qwest went to state regulators to demand that Level 3, which offers competitive pricing on fiber-based backhaul, would have to connect everywhere in the state before it could be allowed to do business. Cecil was fighting this effort to secure an  effective monopoly, and at the last moment Hatfield agreed to testify against the Qwest effort.

Writes Gordon Cook: Spread the word.  Tell it to the farthest corners  of this land that
the power of money to choke the lifeblood out of  rural communities and fuel
the bank accounts of corporate magnates,  is NOT what the United States of
America stands for.  Rather that it  stands for those like Eric Cecil and
Dale Hatfield who will fight for  what they believe is right.  And that it
stands for those who are  willing to risk their well being in order to
preserve freedom of 
opportunity for their fellow citizens.

And now, Mr. Cecil:

Dale_hatfieldDale:

Thanks again for coming up to Wyoming and testifying on the
state of the industry.  Words cannot express my gratitude nor the joy I experienced when you took the stand, and gently brought forth the light
of a fierce reality – that the Wyoming Commission must pay attention to
competition or it will end. 

By your presence I saw every advantage that
Qwest had tried to exploit in this proceeding, and one they exploit in
nearly every proceeding – fear, chauvinism, parochialism, cronyism,
ignorance, and laziness – instantly transform to their glaring
disadvantage.  Their darkness was exposed in deep relief by your light
because in that moment three state commissioners hearing about a dispute
between a CLEC they were half convinced would  never do anything for the state,
using a technology they half=believed was some kind of scam, whose minds
were dulled by after days of confusion, acrimony, evasiveness, technology,
acronyms, and cases, sat bolt upright, cleared their minds and paid
attention.

They paid attention because the moment you reached the stand
that this was no longer some dispute over yet another acrimonious money grab between feuding carriers.   You said all of that without saying 
it.  You said all of that without saying it because you drove up to 
Wyoming by yourself on the uncertain possibility that we might have an
opportunity under Wyoming rules to call you as a rebuttal witness;  because
it wasn’t for the glory – this was an interconnection dispute 
between a
struggling CLEC and the nation’s smallest ILEC in the nation’s  least
populous state; because it was not about the money – you paid  your own way
– gas, hotel and all we gave you was gratitude and  dinner the night before;
because it was about danger – because as the  semi-retired dean of
competition who had schooled the United States and nations worldwide you
laid your reputation on the line in an  adversarial proceeding, subjected
yourself not only to cross 
examination, but cross examination after Qwest
fought for and received right to hold off on cross until after they had
the transcript and a few weeks to prepare for that cross examination on 

February 21; because the Commission reserved its right of cross examination; because Qwest complained it was a setup; because we did 
ask questions on issues of public policy and their witnesses gleefully
responded – we didn’t know they would, but they did; and after sitting in
the hearing room for several hours, you stood up and took the stand and
swore not to perjure yourself.

Your words were secondary to your
presence because this could have been about nothing other than your passion
– innovation, technology and competition – in a word –creativity.  Your
words were 
secondary to your presence because you believe the Internet is revolutionary; right now things aren’t going so well.  None of the 1996
Act promises you worked to make come true are coming about as expected. 
Your words were secondary to your presence because this is really about
your passion for competition – fair competition – and you drove up to
Cheyenne to tell them as much.  Your words were secondary to his presence
because after the commission overruled a  Qwest objection on scope of cross,
you relaxed and opened your heart and delivered your passion.

And in
that eternal moment – eternal because time stood still – you delivered your
words.  And I watched as the perspective of the Wyoming Commission began to
shift – as these and many other multiple realizations simultaneously
silently exploded into their consciousness.   All was still in that room. 
Nothing moved.  Consciousness itself spoke – and told the Wyoming
Commission to  listen.  Wisdom itself spoke — and told the Wyoming
Commission to be careful.  Experience itself spoke and — told the Wyoming
Commission  to care about competition.   Justice itself spoke — and told
the  Wyoming Commission to suspect incumbents who argue for more regulation in one proceeding, deride it in the next and  simultaneously
promote de-regulatory legislation before the  legislature.  Your words were
secondary to your presence, BUT in THAT MOMENT your WORDS, your passion,
your presence, cleared a forest of doubts, objections, biases and apathy;
for a moment, the WY PSC paid  attention in a way it never had before
.

This moment, your words, your presences does not guarantee an outcome; I know that.  But I also know that the WY Commission heard 
your words.  They may later disregard them for whatever reasons, but  in
that moment, they were awake, receptive & listening.  And that was  more
than I could have ever asked or hoped for. 

So, for a soldier  having
fought so many of these battles to only lose to the aforementioned
incumbent advantages, your presence was nothing short of miraculous and 
the single greatest courtroom moment of my career.   It was, in a word,
fun!!!  Your testimony, however, is a gift not 
only to Level 3 but to the
entire industry.  As I told Alex, I’ve  spent quite a bit of time opening
shades to let a little sunlight  into the room; it was awesome to watch you
open your heart and 
through you that sunlight beam straight into the
consciousness of the  Wyoming PSC.   

On behalf of the countless CLECs that I
have had to help  exit the business, those friends and family displaced by
such  dislocation, and those few CLECs that still remain – including my 

client – Thank You.

Previous Post

St. Google and the Dragons

Next Post

The Big Lie In The Broadband Debate

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post

The Big Lie In The Broadband Debate

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

The Coming Labor War

The Insanity of Wealth

May 7, 2025
Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

May 5, 2025
Make America Dutch Again

Make America Dutch Again

April 30, 2025
Bikes and Trains

Opa Fiets is Depressed

April 29, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved