My Photo

Tip Jar

Change is good

Tip Jar

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 08/2003

Blogads

  • Put your ad here with Blogads

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Snap

  • Snap

Cafepress

  • CafePress

ClustrMaps

  • ClustrMaps

BrightAds

  • BrightAds by Kanoodle

What's with Dana?

    follow me on Twitter

    Google Analytics

    • Google Analytics

    « Halfway Through the Process | Main | Don't Get Killed in the Semi-Finals »

    March 27, 2008

    The AntiThesis Must Fall

    Think of this as Volume 11, Number 13 of A-Clue.com, the online newsletter I've written since 1997. Enjoy.


    Hillary_clinton_1 When you look at American politics from the perspective of generations, one of the most startling things you learn is how each generation's Anti-Thesis, the myths, values and assumptions which fought the previous era, must fall as the era falls.

    Easy to say, hard to put into practice, but voters manage it. They do it by building a new Thesis within the rising party, then battling the old Anti-Thesis within their own party  until it's dead.

    Here's how it has run, in every generational crisis, from the last crisis in the 1960s backward through the Civil War:

    • Nelson_rockefeller 40 years ago, this meant the Eisenhower Republicans. The party faction which Dwight D. Eisenhower brought to power was moderate in tone, wanting only to lean against the assumptions of the New Deal and make them work better. By the 1960s this meant Nelson Rockefeller (right), who became a hated figure within the new New York Conservative Party starting in 1960. While Rockefeller ended up (briefly) as Gerald Ford's Vice President, he had lost his relevance by that time. Today moderate Republicanism is just about dead.
    • 36 years before that, this meant Wilson Democrats, represented best by Wilson's own son-in-law, William McAdoo. Woodrow Wilson crafted a marriage of William_mcadoo_time_magazine_cover_ convenience between business-oriented Democrats in the northeast and the remnants of failed Bryan populism. Roosevelt's nomination was fueled by his opposition to the former and his alliance with the latter. It was McAdoo (right), who had tried for the nomination twice before, whom Roosevelt most needed to outmaneuver in order to win himself.
    • Mark_twain_by_joseph_haworth 36 years before that, this meant the Mugwumps. The Mugwumps -- a made-up word implying Big Chiefs -- were reform-minded Democrats who allied with urban machines to elect Grover Cleveland starting in 1884. Cleveland's endorsement of bonds backed by private gold in 1895, meant to stave off U.S. bankruptcy at a time when tariffs were the main source of revenue, collapsed his coalition. Mark Twain (right) is credited with coining the term Mugwump, and represented this early progressive impulse. Theodore Roosevelt inherited the Mugwumps in his Progressive Republican coalition. 
    • Henryclay 36 years before that, this meant the Whigs. The party of Henry Clay (right) believed in "civic improvements" like canals and railroads, meaning they sought a more activist government than the Jacksonians. They were wiped out by the creation of the Republican Party starting in 1854, which had different priorities, namely slavery and industry.

    Notice however that Nixon came out of the Eisenhower Anti-Thesis, that Franklin Roosevelt had been a cabinet member under Wilson, that Theodore Roosevelt had been a young Mugwump, and that Lincoln had run in the 1840s as a Whig. This is what fueled my November, 2007 Clue  and my identification of her as Hillary M. Nixon.

    Bill_and_hillary_clinton_1990s Today, of course, the Clinton Democrats represent the Anti-Thesis to Reaganism, which is the polite term for the Nixon Thesis. Their "Third Way" was meant to "triangulate" between the Republicans and the liberal Democratic base, eking out victories with a policy of moderate reform.

    This worked, in a policy sense, throughout the 1990s, just as Eisenhower's policies seemed to work well during the 1950s, and Wilson's during the 1910s. But when the assumptions these older movements were leaning against -- the FDR New Deal Assumption, the TR Progressive Assumption, the Gilded Age assumptions  -- collapsed, they had to collapse too.

    When I wrote that Hillary Clinton would win this election some months ago, it was based on my assumption she would run like Richard Nixon. Nixon, like FDR before him, had played a big part in the earlier Anti-Thesis, but governed based on a Southern Strategy which was a way of cementing the informal alliance with the Wallace Democrats of 1968.

    Edith_galt_wilson Instead, mainly thanks to the rise of Barack Obama, Clinton has had to run, lately, more as the living ghost of her husband. She has become almost like Edith Galt Wilson (left), who practically ran the country after her husband's 1919 stroke. In all her mau-mauing about having played an active role in her husband's Presidency, it's funny how she never tried to claim credit for keeping the wheels going while Bill was in the throes of Monica-Gate.

    It's because his Woodrow Wilson is still alive.

    Even if, by some unlikely miracle, Hillary Clinton became the nominee and won the election, she would still have to govern as something new, based on the new coalition built by Howard Dean, John Edwards, and Barack Obama. She has destroyed herself these last weeks by explicitly running against that coalition, and that's the real story of this month.

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2773/27518320

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The AntiThesis Must Fall:

    Comments

    I recall being told that a Mugwump was a fence-sitter, "With his mug on one side of the fence and his wump on the other." Sic transit moderati.

    Post a comment

    If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In