Dana Blankenhorn

Real vs. Real

Analysts, and investors, are always fighting the last war.

The last war was the asset bubbles of the 1990s and 2000s. The first was in tech. The second was in housing.

Both fell after the bubble hit. Both times the government responded by juicing demand, first with the “forever wars,” then with a domestic stimulus and helicopter money.

Both times, this worked because the problem wasn’t related to what happened during the 1970s. Back then, resource inflation was to be feared. There was no substitute for oil. Now it’s just speculation and its aftermath.

The same kind of blow-off is happening now. There’s a fear that money will cost money, so speculators are pulling back, selling everything else to raise cash. (Cash is doing fine.) So far, it’s not nearly as bad as what came before. But fear is gripping the market because, this time, it’s accompanied by inflation.

A Non-Standard Story of Solar Shingles

When I first covered renewable energy a decade ago, solar shingles were the Holy Grail. It was what everyone said they wanted to make. A solar shingle would be as efficient at creating electricity as a solar panel but would go on just like a regular roof, with a nail gun.

A lot of people tried and failed to create the product. Home Depot tried selling homeowner-installed solar panels. Elon Musk built a billion dollar “Gigafactory” in Buffalo, New York, supposedly to make solar shingles.

But at the truncated Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas this year, a game-changing solar shingle finally debuted. Its story is almost as interesting as the technology.

The shingle is called Timberline. Sandia Labs helped develop it. The manufacturer is GAF Energy.

The shingles are slightly bigger and much heavier than conventional roof shingles, but they go on the same way, with a nail gun. GAF says it has invested $1 billion into the product, which converts 22.3% of solar energy hitting it into electricity. 

GAF itself may be more interesting than its shingle. It was once the U.S. arm of I.G. Farben, the Nazi chemical company seized after World War II.  Under Jesse Werner, it became a big roofing company in the 1980s. This included an outfit called Rubberoid, which owned an asbestos mine in Vermont. (Oops.) Under the name G.I. Holdings, it went bankrupt in 2001 but was still paying out to victims in 2011.

Creativity Economy to the Rescue

It really is the best of times, and the worst of times. At the exact same time.

In one reality, stocks trade at record levels, homes are worth their weight in gold, and fortunes head for the stratosphere.

In the other reality inflation is rampant, people can’t afford to retire, and millions are losing confidence in the future.

The fact that all these things are true is a political choice, one Washington pundits insist will be reinforced in 2022 and beyond. The pundit class is driving Democrats crazy, and the seeming passivity of the Biden Administration has them hopping mad.

But a lot of things are going to happen next year, and most of them aren’t bad.

For starters, we have it relatively easy. Chinese consumers who pre-paid for homes now find they’re not being built. Turkish consumers are finding their money is becoming worthless. Britain is going broke thanks to Brexit. Inflation and COVID are much worse in South America and Africa than they are here.

Most countries across the world are sleepwalking toward crisis while the bill for climate inaction is coming due.

There’s only one force that can take decisive action against the crisis, the Creativity Economy.

Technology Can Whip Inflation Now

Bankers, reporters, and politicians are all focused on inflation right now.

Markets know better.

It’s true prices are rising. Wages are rising, too. Working conditions are even improving. I fail to see a problem here.

But just as some prices rise, other prices fall. Lumber prices have already rolled over. As electric cars begin to roll off lots next year, gas prices should ease.

A generation ago, it was hard to counteract rising commodity prices. Macro analysts are still locked into that mindset.

But now there’s software. Software scales. Software fights inflation with productivity. Clouds also fight inflation, helping scientists and engineers create substitutes for resources.

The Inflation Opportunity

A lot of people are complaining about inflation right now.

In our technology age, this is nonsense.

Consider energy prices. Oil and gas prices are rising fast. But this creates an enormous incentive for anyone building solar panels or wind turbines. It blows through political objections to their installation. It brings capital to start-ups with new ideas that will dramatically increase harvesting efficiency. Harvesting energy, and increasing efficiency in our use of electricity, drive down demand and, thus, prices. The end of oil is one of the decade’s great opportunities and now is the time to seize it.

What the Futurists Got Wrong

Futurists anticipated a lot of important things. They imagined space before we got there. They saw the environmental disaster of this century from a long way away.

But there are two things they got very, very wrong. Computing and resources.

Look at Star Trek. The communicators and tricorders used in the 1960s version of the show were primitive by early 21^st century standards. As one cartoon put it, “all it does is make phone calls?”

I don’t know of a single SciFi author of any renown who saw Moore’s Law coming. Most defined progress through manufacturing automation, which only improves arithmetically. Even those seeing improvements in computing didn’t see how Moore’s Law would take off in every direction computing touched. They didn’t see the iPhone and didn’t see the cloud.

William Gibson came closest. In Neuromancer he imagined something called “cyberspace.” But it was strangely primitive next to the modern Internet. He has since watched throughout his career as history caught up with him. His later novels seemed to take place in the present. His latest, Agency, is alt-history.

As wrong as futurists were on computing, they’re even more wrong on resources. Most writers, like Allen Steele, saw today’s Near Space era as a battle for resources. We would be running out of heavy metals, the thinking went, and ways to generate electricity. We would need to mine the asteroids.

The Downside of Energy Abundance

The first half of the last decade was marked by an energy gold rush.

Fracking made the USA energy independent for the first time in decades. Outside its impact on the environment, the boom was short-lived.

By 2014 demand was beating supply, and the boom has now turned to dust.

It wasn’t solar and wind power that killed the boom. It was efficiency and technology. LEDs require a lot less power than fluorescent bulbs. Intelligence added to warehouses and stores reduces the need still further. Insulation means you need less electricity for heating. New appliances are more energy efficient. The cloud is super-efficient, and the excess energy can be recycled. Laptop technology means this took less power to write than it would have then.

The oilpatch did its bit to kill the boom, too. There are now huge oilfields off South America and Africa that we didn’t know about before. The eastern Mediterranean gas fields have made Israel independent of Arab energy. Things like fracking and boiling the Alberta tar sands aren’t just environmentally destructive. They’re economically worthless.

All these things have put a thumb down on energy prices. That thumb is getting bigger over time. As I predicted in 2010 (based on Department of Energy research) we have now achieved “crossover,” the point where renewable energy costs less to exploit than fossil fuels. It’s hard today to justify a new natural gas plant. Soon, solar will cost less than gas fired in an existing burner.

The result is going to be another energy boom, this time a renewable energy boom.

But this one, too, has a sell-by date.

Resources and the New Era: What the Best Futurists Got Wrong

This coming year represents the start of a new era.

It’s an era defined by technology, as much as the previous era was defined by resources.

I’ve written here many times that the gating factor for technology is human capital. The more trained, empowered, and willing human minds you can bring to bear, the more you can grow. Contrast this to the resource era, where the key to growth was control, over the land and what lay on or beneath it.

The politics of 2020 were defined by the clash of these two economies. It was expressed throughout the culture. But the market made its verdict clear, and it was a true landslide.

Biden’s Solar Problem

Assuming Joe Biden wins Tuesday, he has a problem.

If he doesn’t win, America and the world have a bigger problem, one I don’t think we can overcome. So, let’s assume the world goes on for a moment.

Joe’s solar problem is something the computer industry faced around the time when I was becoming a reporter, in the late 1970s. Until then, computers were capital goods. They were either leased or purchased over time with loans. Even my first PC purchase, in 1982, was with a loan.

Loans and leases built a business model that was smashed by the PC era. Both loans and leases carry huge external costs and margins. My Massapequa neighbors had nice houses and cars. Their fat sales or engineering salaries were paid for by IBM customers, who compared the cost of having IBM handle their problems to the cost of doing things manually and signed their names to lines that were dotted.

In 1981 IBM didn’t just start selling a PC. It became a computer products company. It licensed the likeness of Charlie Chaplin, who had died in 1976, from his estate. It used the rose he offered his amour in City Lights, painting it a bright red. Then it distributed the PC through computer stores, who placed it on shelves alongside the printers and other peripherals. By the 1990s you wouldn’t think of hiring a “computer specialist” to sell you stuff, unless we were talking about a networking expert who got his own hands dirty.

The Common Good

Without an overwhelming victory for democracy on November 3, I’ll be glad to die.

Trump is the ultimate expression of a basic misperception, that private goods matter more than the public goods, that national well-being matters more than global well-being, that fences and borders can isolate and separate us.

This is especially true when it comes to the environment.

My children face a bleak future unless current climate trends are reversed. But the U.S. can’t change it alone. Every country must do its part.

The ice caps’ disappearance means many cities around the world are doomed. New Orleans is doomed. Miami is doomed. New York City is doomed. So are Calcutta, Mumbai, Shanghai, and Kuala Lumpur. Sea level rise means these places will soon be underwater.

Meanwhile, the methane of the Siberian tundra is bubbling to the surface. Fires in the Amazon and West mean the Earth can no longer breathe. The “habitable” part of the U.S. will be cut by two-thirds within 50 years. The oceans are warming so that, along with overfishing, all that’s left will be jellyfish.

In past bouts of global warming, when the ice caps disappeared, nature adjusted. Cooling trends returned and nature came back. With man-made global warming, there’s no natural reversal. It takes 80 grams of energy to melt a gram of ice. Once the ice is melted, 80 grams of energy take its temperature to 112.