Dana Blankenhorn

The 1983 Game

By my calculations, oil took over political dominance from manufacturing in 1968. Tech took over from oil in 2008.

That means we’re now playing the 1983 game. (This will be my 40th Peachtree Road Race. That's me at my second, in 1984.)

That was the year I bought my house. Interest rates were still high making the $49,500 price hard to afford. While oilman George H.W. Bush was VP, it was the defense and media industries who had Ronald Reagan’s ear. The oil shortage of the 1970s had turned into an oil glut, fueled by the Administration pushing the Saudis to keep pumping even while prices paid to Texas oilmen were falling.

This should sound familiar to today’s tech tycoons. Even while Californian Kamala Harris sits as VP, the industry is being battered in Washington. There are calls to break up the company, to tightly regulate the Internet. The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank was a bad look.

The industry thus faces a political choice.

A lot of the big swinging dicks of the last decade have made their choice. Led by Peter Thiel, a lot of them are putting all the cash they can into Republican campaigns. They see control of the government, under the leadership of a Republican party dedicated to their specific interests, as the best route forward.

20th Century Blues

The 20^th Century was the bloodiest in history.

World War I. World War II. Vietnam. Afghanistan. The Gulf War.

And those are just the wars the U.S. was a direct party to.

There were lots of others. In all cases they were caused by fear. Fear of the other, or the other side. Nations battling nations for dominance like rutting goats.

There was some hope, after the Cold War, that those days were ending.

They didn’t. Russia just regrouped, and China decided they wanted to play, too.

Humanity can’t afford this. Never mind who’s right and who’s wrong. (We’re right. They’re wrong.) The waste of natural wealth, the continued abuse of fossil fuels, the climate can’t handle it.

Unless we can find a way out of the current conflict with China, our grandchildren won’t have a livable planet. There’s no Planet B.

The Apartment Crisis

I wrote about the housing crisis” last year. My focus was on the tax law. It needs to discourage private equity from buying up houses, and encourage home ownership.

But there’s a second element at work. It’s demographic. Millennials, like my kids, aren’t marrying. If they’re marrying, they’re not having kids. They want small apartments near where they work. Most of them work in cities, where it’s very expensive to build.

Developers, united with young renters, are trying to increase density by block-busting urban homeowners. That’s what a lot of the current “affordable housing” debate is about. I saw it in the 1960s, when it was a racial divide. It’s ugly and leads to crime.

The good news is that apartment construction is already increasing. It is now near the level it was in 1972, just before the first oil crisis. If interest rates moderate even a little, the industry will blow past that number. 

I’m no NIMBY. Planned density can work. But rather than giving developers open season to wreck home values in the name of “15 minute neighborhoods," destroying the tree canopy, start with “30-minute cities," so that the infrastructure keeps up with the demand.

Jimmy

Jimmy Carter was born in 1924, in the heart of the Jim Crow era, and in the center of the Jim Crow south.

This was one year before the Scopes Monkey Trial, five years before the birth of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. The year saw the KKK march down Pennsylvania Avenue in full regalia and with police protection.

Protection also came from the faith Carter’s family practiced. Alcohol was illegal, abortion was strictly illegal, but lynching was very legal. The Southern Baptist Convention into which Carter was born had supported slavery, it supported segregation, and they called it all God’s law.

It has been hard for me to understand, just how and where this good man was raised, the beliefs he overcame to become what he was. I didn’t even start to understand it until I moved here, after his presidency, and saw how the struggle continues today, on both sides.

Carter didn’t enter politics until he was 42, running for State Senate. While Governor in 1973 he appeared on the game show “What’s My Life,” saying he was running for President. While the panelists weren’t blindfolded, no one recognized him. His entire political life lasted just 14 years.

Rope a Dope

You may be too young to recall, but the greatest fight in history occurred in 1974.

“The Rumble in the Jungle” was more noteworthy for the tactic of challenger Muhammad Ali than the result. Ali called it the “rope a dope.” He held his forearms against his body and let George Foreman punch himself out. Ali won in the 8^th round.

In the war against Trumpism, Joe Biden is using the same tactic. It requires patience, discipline, and getting hit a lot. But a politics based on always attacking exhausts the attacker. It leaves them open to a counterpunch.

To make the rope a dope work, you must take some hits. Gandhi knew that. Dr. King knew that. People must see the cliff they’re falling into. Not just what the monkeys on Fox News claim, the world organ grinders like Rupert Murdoch are shaping.

YIMBY vs. NIMBY

There’s a growing movement of renters, working in conjunction with real estate developers, aiming to blockbust urban neighborhoods.

It’s called Yes In My Back Yard (YIMBY). It creates political support for developers in the name of “affordable housing.” It calls homeowners NIMBYs (for Not In My Back Yard) and denigrates their concerns. It’s a great way for developers to make money and it’s splitting cities apart.

If you’re renting this isn’t your backyard. Renters have no stake in the future of the places they rent. Owners do. Neighborhoods of renters are less stable than those where owners occupy houses. The owners of rental housing often resist repairs, and those who live in rental housing don’t take up that slack. It’s the difference between the chicken and the pig at breakfast time. A renter may be interested. An owner is committed.

The Limits of Senior Power

If I were around 100 years ago, I would be dead. Instead, I’m rich. (Pictured are my grandparents, May and Edmund O'Donnell, in 1918.)

It’s a demographic and economic transformation that is destroying hope for change in America and (perhaps) making us the last generation.

Until recently, people lived their first 20 years dependent on parents, the next 20 as parents, the next (if they were lucky) 20 as grandparents and anything past that dependent on the children. Most of the world still lives this way.

But starting with Social Security in 1934, and continuing through general prosperity to today, America has turned this on its head. Seniors aren’t just living to an average age of 83, we’re doing it with money. I’m just a 68-year old journalist but, thanks in large part to a wife who works in tech, I’m a millionaire. We own our house. We have enough invested to guarantee a fine retirement, God willing. There may even be something left when we’re gone.

This has changed political incentives. There’s no better example than Florida where The Villages, a huge retirement town of 150,000 (almost all of whom vote), has turned the state’s politics on its head. Add them to those already living up-and-down the state’s east, west and south coasts, and you get a huge state entirely devoted to short term thinking. Education, the environment? Fuck ‘em. We’ll be gone.

Why Adani Fell

The U.S. stock market is off to the races again, encouraged by hints that interest rates may peak soon, and that the economy continues to grow.

But under the radar, there’s a crash. It’s in Adani Group, which you can trade over the counter under the symbol ANNRY. 

A week ago, Adani was worth over $200 billion. Today it’s fighting to hold $100 billion. CEO Gautam Adani has seen his own fortune fall to $75 billion.

This tells you something. Adani is closely held.

The stocks crashed after a report from short seller Hindenburg Group charged that they were being held up by a network of offshore companies and a very thin float. What made Hindenburg suspicious was that the value of the companies rose over 800% in just a few years, on assets like coal mines, container ports, and airports. It didn’t make sense.

But there’s another lesson here, America’s dominance of the global marketplace. About 40% of the world’s stock market value is now held in the two U.S. markets – the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ. About 60% of the world’s liquidity, the capital companies require to do business, is in the U.S. That’s why the threat to cut off Chinese stocks from U.S. exchanges was so powerful. It’s why the Hindenburg report blew such a big hole in Adani’s market battleship.

The Why of the Guns

Guns have replaced drugs as the tool of systemic racism.

When I was young drugs were effective at this. Push drugs on young black people who are unemployed and feeling hopeless. Arrest the black people doing the drugs. Toss them in jail and they’re not only slaves (for the duration of their sentence) but non-voters for life.

It worked.

But as white folk started getting sentenced, and as black families learned better, you needed a new mechanism.

Lax gun laws are the mechanism.

Righteous War

America hasn’t fought many righteous wars.

In the 19^th century the Civil War was righteous. Everything else was conquest. The “winning of the west” was a slow motion genocide. We took the Southwest from Mexico. We took the Philippines and Puerto Rico from Spain. We teach it as democracy, as freedom. It was empire.

World War II was righteous. In retrospect, I’m glad we fought in Korea.

Other than that? We have been involved in more coups, in more places, for worse reasons, than the British Empire ever thought of. Vietnam was not a righteous war. The Gulf War was not a righteous war. Neither was the Iraq War. Afghanistan began as a righteous mission then turned into a distinctly unrighteous war.

Americans have the blood of the world on our hands, and we deny that every day. The difference between the parties is that Republicans do it more systematically.