Dana Blankenhorn

SBF 30 (or higher)

“White collar crime” is crime.

Robbing someone at pen point is worse than doing it at gunpoint. You’re in a position of trust. You have a fiduciary responsibility. You are supposed to have ethics, before you have the law, to guide your actions.

Break all of that and it can be murder. People die when their wealth and future is stolen. White collar thieves steal college educations, they steal retirements, they steal food from the mouths of grandbabies. They make every honest businessperson suspect.

I thought everyone felt that way until I heard Michael Lewis, author of The Big Short and other light classics, interview Harvard Business School professor Eugene Soltes on his podcast Against the Rules.” 

Everything is Liquid

What happened to Silicon Valley Bank is known as a liquidity crisis.

They had plenty of assets. But the assets were in instruments whose value had fallen, that weren’t worth as much as the bank claimed. When Peter Thiel and his bros learned this, they all pulled out their money at once and the bank collapsed.

The main lesson is that everything is now liquid.

Financial assets are liquid. Political assets are liquid. Your reputation and marriage are liquid.

Before the Web was spun this wasn’t the case. It would take time for depositors to pull their money out of a bank, time the bank could use to sell assets in an orderly way. There were still runs but these could be managed through regulation.

This time the fall was sudden, and the punishment had to be severe. The executives all lost their jobs. They deserve to face criminal charges, for cashing out while the walls were falling around them. Everyone who invested in SVB or its debt lost all their money. That’s a hit of nearly $100 billion, mainly to very rich people. Hopefully it teaches other banks to manage their assets better, to sell out money-losing securities quickly so they’re not caught out, in other words to be more transparent.

The 1983 Game

By my calculations, oil took over political dominance from manufacturing in 1968. Tech took over from oil in 2008.

That means we’re now playing the 1983 game. (This will be my 40th Peachtree Road Race. That's me at my second, in 1984.)

That was the year I bought my house. Interest rates were still high making the $49,500 price hard to afford. While oilman George H.W. Bush was VP, it was the defense and media industries who had Ronald Reagan’s ear. The oil shortage of the 1970s had turned into an oil glut, fueled by the Administration pushing the Saudis to keep pumping even while prices paid to Texas oilmen were falling.

This should sound familiar to today’s tech tycoons. Even while Californian Kamala Harris sits as VP, the industry is being battered in Washington. There are calls to break up the company, to tightly regulate the Internet. The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank was a bad look.

The industry thus faces a political choice.

A lot of the big swinging dicks of the last decade have made their choice. Led by Peter Thiel, a lot of them are putting all the cash they can into Republican campaigns. They see control of the government, under the leadership of a Republican party dedicated to their specific interests, as the best route forward.

Run on the Bank

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank may prove to be a bigger story than it appears.

The reason goes back to a story I ran away from, the 1981 collapse of the Houston oil industry.

I didn’t intend to run away. I finally got a job at a daily in Birmingham, Alabama. It was a job I’d hold only 4 months before being fired. But I left Houston June 1, 1981. The collapse began soon after.

As in this case, the Fed had telegraphed what it was going to do. Paul Volcker was going to raise interest rates until inflation gave up, just as Jerome Powell is doing now. Inflation was much higher than, double digits in fact. Add to that the Reagan Administration jawboning the Saudis for lower oil prices and it was a perfect storm.

The Apartment Crisis

I wrote about the housing crisis” last year. My focus was on the tax law. It needs to discourage private equity from buying up houses, and encourage home ownership.

But there’s a second element at work. It’s demographic. Millennials, like my kids, aren’t marrying. If they’re marrying, they’re not having kids. They want small apartments near where they work. Most of them work in cities, where it’s very expensive to build.

Developers, united with young renters, are trying to increase density by block-busting urban homeowners. That’s what a lot of the current “affordable housing” debate is about. I saw it in the 1960s, when it was a racial divide. It’s ugly and leads to crime.

The good news is that apartment construction is already increasing. It is now near the level it was in 1972, just before the first oil crisis. If interest rates moderate even a little, the industry will blow past that number. 

I’m no NIMBY. Planned density can work. But rather than giving developers open season to wreck home values in the name of “15 minute neighborhoods," destroying the tree canopy, start with “30-minute cities," so that the infrastructure keeps up with the demand.

That 2002 Feeling

The last tech crash began in 2000 and I was in the center of it, a mid-career writer with a specialty called Internet Commerce.

That year saw denial and bargaining.

The next year saw anger and depression.

It was only in 2002 that acceptance came.

We know what followed. Talented programmers worked on open source projects and standards bodies created what became the Cloud. When proprietary advantage became worthless, and there seemed there was nothing to do, people worked together with technical goals in mind rather than just financial ones.

It was a slow build. In 2002 my gross income was zero dollars. In 2003 it was zero dollars. I got interested in what’s now the Machine Internet, which I christened the World of Always On, and in 2004 I finally made a few dollars. The next year I was asked to cover Open Source, and my career took off. For a time.

I’ve mentioned before how, in every photo of a stock market crash the people in it look similar. Similar age, similar backgrounds. They’re different people. Those who watched the 1987 crash were different from those who saw the 2000 crash, different from those who saw 2008, different from those who saw 2022.

YIMBY vs. NIMBY

There’s a growing movement of renters, working in conjunction with real estate developers, aiming to blockbust urban neighborhoods.

It’s called Yes In My Back Yard (YIMBY). It creates political support for developers in the name of “affordable housing.” It calls homeowners NIMBYs (for Not In My Back Yard) and denigrates their concerns. It’s a great way for developers to make money and it’s splitting cities apart.

If you’re renting this isn’t your backyard. Renters have no stake in the future of the places they rent. Owners do. Neighborhoods of renters are less stable than those where owners occupy houses. The owners of rental housing often resist repairs, and those who live in rental housing don’t take up that slack. It’s the difference between the chicken and the pig at breakfast time. A renter may be interested. An owner is committed.

Fire Sundar Pichai

Recessions are good for markets.

They show us where the rot is, where the poor performers are.

This current one is no exception. It revealed that some of our Cloud Czars, the companies dominating the global economy with hyperscale datacenters paid for with cash flow, aren’t as clothed in gold as they seem. Some are downright naked.

Early this month, I identified one source of rot and urged Jeff Bezos to fire Amazon.Com CEO Andy Jassy. But it’s also time for two other founders to get back in the game. Larry Page and Sergey Brin need to push out Sundar Pichai.

Pichai is the kind of numbers-oriented manager Wall Street loves, but Silicon Valley should despise. He’s the kind of go along, get along guy who can make the trains run on time, but completely lacks vision. In technology this is a fatal flaw.

It’s obvious in how he dealt with artificial intelligence, the new hotness of 2023.

This is not about firing an ethicist. It’s a more basic failure to see where things were going, and deploy the necessary resources to get there. 

The Limits of Senior Power

If I were around 100 years ago, I would be dead. Instead, I’m rich. (Pictured are my grandparents, May and Edmund O'Donnell, in 1918.)

It’s a demographic and economic transformation that is destroying hope for change in America and (perhaps) making us the last generation.

Until recently, people lived their first 20 years dependent on parents, the next 20 as parents, the next (if they were lucky) 20 as grandparents and anything past that dependent on the children. Most of the world still lives this way.

But starting with Social Security in 1934, and continuing through general prosperity to today, America has turned this on its head. Seniors aren’t just living to an average age of 83, we’re doing it with money. I’m just a 68-year old journalist but, thanks in large part to a wife who works in tech, I’m a millionaire. We own our house. We have enough invested to guarantee a fine retirement, God willing. There may even be something left when we’re gone.

This has changed political incentives. There’s no better example than Florida where The Villages, a huge retirement town of 150,000 (almost all of whom vote), has turned the state’s politics on its head. Add them to those already living up-and-down the state’s east, west and south coasts, and you get a huge state entirely devoted to short term thinking. Education, the environment? Fuck ‘em. We’ll be gone.

Why Adani Fell

The U.S. stock market is off to the races again, encouraged by hints that interest rates may peak soon, and that the economy continues to grow.

But under the radar, there’s a crash. It’s in Adani Group, which you can trade over the counter under the symbol ANNRY. 

A week ago, Adani was worth over $200 billion. Today it’s fighting to hold $100 billion. CEO Gautam Adani has seen his own fortune fall to $75 billion.

This tells you something. Adani is closely held.

The stocks crashed after a report from short seller Hindenburg Group charged that they were being held up by a network of offshore companies and a very thin float. What made Hindenburg suspicious was that the value of the companies rose over 800% in just a few years, on assets like coal mines, container ports, and airports. It didn’t make sense.

But there’s another lesson here, America’s dominance of the global marketplace. About 40% of the world’s stock market value is now held in the two U.S. markets – the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ. About 60% of the world’s liquidity, the capital companies require to do business, is in the U.S. That’s why the threat to cut off Chinese stocks from U.S. exchanges was so powerful. It’s why the Hindenburg report blew such a big hole in Adani’s market battleship.