Dana Blankenhorn

Business Needs Consensus

I have long believed historians misread the Progressive Era.

They see it as a victory for liberal values.

I read it as a victory for business. Which isn’t necessarily a different thing.

Fact is, the business of America is business. America has always been led by a dominant industry. Farming, then cotton, then railroads, then infrastructure, manufacturing, oil, and now technology.

Power flows to the highest-value industry and, when that is supplanted, flows away from it. Just as cotton lost to the railroads in the Civil War, I believe railroads lost to infrastructure in the Progressive Era.

What the great inventions of the late 19^th century – electricity, telephony, and the automobile – required for mass adoption was scaled, organized infrastructure. Having two or more electric utilities, two or more phone companies, or (God forbid) two or more private road networks made no sense. What Wall Street saw in the 1890s was that monopolies created efficiency.

But the monopolies would need the approval of government. The price of government approval, in a democracy, would be regulation, and some means of control over the result.

I Have a Dream for Netiquette

In the mid-1980s I joined a group called the Electronic Networking Association.

The ENA believed, naively, that if people could communicate across their differences, they might understand each other better.

Few people used the Internet then. We were all elites, intellectually at least. We were thoughtful and we shared a First World viewpoint, even if we lived in Japan, Europe or Africa. We shared values, sort of like the Quakers. 

What we believed in was Netiquette. These are simple rules for civilized behavior. Assume goodwill. Don’t yell. In short, be nice. When in doubt, apologize and resolve to do better.  

The punishment for a violation of Netiquette was a stern talking to, for both sides of the argument. The punishment for repeated outbursts was to be shunned by the group, dismissed, cast off.

The Coming Streaming Shakeout

Streaming is about to learn what the printed web learned 20 years ago.

In a world of unlimited content, the gating factor for your audience is time.

There’s a corollary. Don’t depend on ads to make up for this. There’s just too much inventory.

I have a bad tendency to be early to things. I screamed about the dot-com bubble in 1997. I’ve been yammering about the coming streaming crash since 2019.

But now it’s here. First Netflix (NFLX) fell from grace. Then Disney (DIS) did the same. The Cloud Czars are worth half what they were now that you can get paid for having money. When interest rates were 2%, a price to earnings multiple of 45 looked OK. With money at 5% you need to be below 20 to be competitive.

Fixing Twitter on Mastodon

Twitter is broken beyond repair.

But it can be fixed. On Mastodon. If users learn something I learned back in 1988.

I’m @danablankenhorn@journa.host on Mastodon. Journa.host is run by Adam Davidson, formerly of The New Yorker. It’s one of thousands of servers supporting Mastodon on the Internet.

Users can block users on Twitter. But on Mastodon servers can also block servers. Users can also move between servers. This means people choose whatever server conforms to their standards on what should be blocked and what allowed. You can have alt-right servers, alt-left servers, and alt-bicycling servers.

A lot of people, looking at Mastodon over the last few weeks, have looked askance at this. People are isolating behind their server walls, they complain. Or they might.

But that was always true for Twitter. It was designed to be. The problem is that many people didn’t use their block commands aggressively enough. Journalists amplified extreme views by retweeting them. Hate was amplified by user outrage.

Bad News is Good News

A few weeks ago, I noted how the “bad news” at Snap, Twitter and other social media companies can easily be interpreted as good news.. If people are no longer interested in rage tweeting, they could be becoming more thoughtful. They could be reserving judgment. They could have found real lives.

The same is true, doubly so, with the recent “problems” at chip stocks like Nvidia, Micron and Qualcomm. Prices for commodity chips are falling. The “chip shortage” is easing. In the near term it means lower profits for big chip companies. Sell, sell, sell.

But it also means falling prices and more supply for companies that use chips. It means car prices could start declining. It means the Machine Internet can get a fresh start.

The Streaming Crash

A small fall in subscriber numbers sent Netflix stock down 25% overnight in what stock market observers are calling the “streaming crash.”

All the companies involved in streaming crashed in sympathy. Paramount was down 11%. Warner Discovery dropped 5%. Disney was down 4% and even Amazon lost 2%.

As usual I was early to this. I wrote about the streaming crash in 2019.  “The limits to the streaming market are time and, to a lesser extent, money,” I wrote. If you were reading closely, you’d know the most important limit is time.

The Metaverse Problem

Back in 2009, I covered Taiwan’s CompuText show, alongside my son, then 18.

We spent four days wandering the halls, on the hunt for “desktop Linux.” We eventually found Linux Foundation head Jim Zemlin addressing a small group in a corner of Taiwan 101, the city’s tallest building, miles from the show’s main hall. It’s become something of a joke between us since then.

The point is there was no desktop Linux. You can argue that Google Android is Linux, or that the Mac OS is based on a Linux, but these aren’t truly open systems. Linux is, and was, primarily a server technology.

This is important to note when thinking about Web 3.0, or the Metaverse, as the buzzword advocates call it. They say it’s the biggest thing since the Web was spun, nearly 3 decades ago. It’s certainly the biggest thing since the Cloud, which Amazon began selling 15 years ago.

Unbundling Cable

Over the weekend, Google briefly carried through on its threat to remove 15 Disney channels from its YouTube TV cable replacement and cut the price by $15/month.

Coverage focused on the brevity of the cut-off. In the process they missed the story.

This is the first time anyone has successfully unbundled cable TV. Previous threats by programmers to cut off cable operators succeeded because customers complained. The operators never cut their prices in response, as Google did in this case, and as it threatened to do earlier with Comcast.

Disney’s bluff included the line that disaffected viewers could \buy the “Disney Bundle,” combining its ESPN+, Hulu+, and Disney+ streams, for less than the YouTube price cut. What Google wanted was for Disney to charge it no more than it would cable operations of similar size. They likely got that.

Controlling Data for Good

When we talk about control over data, we start with metadata. These are vast stores of data on what people are searching for online, data about data.

Google and Meta Platforms (Facebook) use metadata to control advertising. Metadata lets advertisers reach specific consumers for the same price as the general network. The aggregation and organization of markets, once done through journalism, no longer pays.

The same techniques, applied to content, led us to Trump. Victims stay within a walled garden of propaganda. Facts can never get in. People don’t just vote based on this. They refuse vaccines, buy guns, and die. He who controls the data makes the rules.

The Iron Triangle

For 200 years, since the Monroe Doctrine, Latin America has been ruled by an Iron Triangle of economic oligarchs, religious extremists, and militarists, backed by the veto of the U.S. government.

Democracy and liberty never stood a chance. Even when “leftists” took power, as in Cuba, Nicaragua, or Venezuela, they simply adapted the system. The party became the religion, and the party leaders the oligarchs. The military rules. Power flows from the barrel of a gun.

We teach our kids that America never adopted that system, but we did. In the American South, from 1876 until roughly the mid-1950s. The KKK was the military, the Southern Baptists were the religious, and local landowners were the oligarchs. Textile manufacturers moved south and adapted to it. It was the refusal of northern businesses to go along after World War II that led to its breakup.