• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home Broadband

Frankston Tries Satire

by Dana Blankenhorn
May 30, 2006
in Broadband, Broadband Gap, business models, business strategy, Communications Policy, Competitive Broadband Fiber, network neutrality, WiFi
2
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Jonathan_swift
In the tradition of Jonathan Swift’s 1729 classic A Modest Proposal, Bob Frankston has turned the net neutrality debate on its head with a brilliant satire called Paying by the Stroll.

In this lovely little yarn, sidewalks are treated the way most want to treat bits. That is, when his character arrives at his new home he is urged to sign up with a "Transportation Service Provider" (TSP) and can only want what that TSP decides he can want.

Of course it’s ludicrous. That’s just the point. (So was the Irish eating their young. That was Swift’s point.)

Bits, and the movement of bits, are now basic infrastructure, and the costs of that basic infrastructure are declining. Yet today’s phone and cable giants insist that, in fact, infrastructure is expensive, that maintaining it is highly people-intensive, and that you should not only face rising prices for your bits, but they should control what you do with them.

By turning Moore’s Law on its head, then standing underneath and shaking all the change that falls from the people, the Bells and CableCos hope to survive. But they can’t.

In our world the need for bits is going up, and will continue to go up, even as the actual price of moving bits goes down. Today’s 802.11n radios cost less than 802.11b did six years ago. The cost of optical multiplexing is falling, as the capacity of each fiber strand keeps rising.

Reality is even more bitter than Frankston’s satire. The cost of putting in sidewalks is increasing, and in my part of east Atlanta crews are even now laying them down on streets that never had them until the houses along them came to cost $250,000 and more. It takes a crew of a dozen men a full week to grade and lay a block of sidewalk.

Bob_frankston_3
But you don’t have to do that to lay down new fiber capacity, or new
wireless capacity. You don’t have to dig up the streets to get more
bits. The only reason you’re being charged as much as you are is
because the phone giants are hoarding the bits, claiming in Congress
the bits should become "services" like cable, and that other bits
should be "services" like cellular.

The real question in all this is who will capture that value, and what
will they do with it? The Bells want to hoard that value, dribble it
out with an eye dropper, define it all as "services" and have you pay
through the nose.

I think it’s time we turned their world on its head, and faced it
right-side up. That’s my modest proposal — the Bells must die.

Tags: BellsBob FrankstonCableCosJonathan Swiftnet neutralitysatireTelecomm Policytelecomm satire
Previous Post

Vixie Identifies the Bind

Next Post

The 1966 Game: Who’s Wallace Now?

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post

The 1966 Game: Who's Wallace Now?

Comments 2

  1. Jesse Kopelman says:
    19 years ago

    I think satire may well be dead at this point. The things politicians (both those in business and in government) say with a straight face has very little relation to rational thought. Merely saying something that is logicially consistent is enough to be satire, these days.

    Reply
  2. Jesse Kopelman says:
    19 years ago

    I think satire may well be dead at this point. The things politicians (both those in business and in government) say with a straight face has very little relation to rational thought. Merely saying something that is logicially consistent is enough to be satire, these days.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

The Coming Labor War

The Insanity of Wealth

May 7, 2025
Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

May 5, 2025
Make America Dutch Again

Make America Dutch Again

April 30, 2025
Bikes and Trains

Opa Fiets is Depressed

April 29, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved