• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home A-Clue

The Renewable Stimulus

by Dana Blankenhorn
July 1, 2011
in A-Clue, business models, business strategy, Crisis of 2008, Current Affairs, energy, environment, political philosophy, politics, regulation, solar energy, The Age of Obama, The War Against Oil, wind power
12
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Think of this as Volume 15, Number 28 of A-Clue.com, the online newsletter I've written since 1997. Enjoy.


Democrat-vs-republican Why has this recession been so intractable?

Partly because both Democrats and Republicans are wrong about what it takes to get out of it.

Democrats are wrong to think mere Keynesian stimulus will create growth. Such a stimulus is designed to increase aggregate demand. Aggregate demand is not the problem. In the 1930s demand was stalled everywhere, but today there is growing demand throughout Asia, Africa, Latin America and northern Europe.

Republicans are also wrong to think we can get our debt down by cutting government spending. Banks are never made whole when they treat customers this way. The only real way out is through growth, and cutting spending reduces both the supply and demand for goods, leading to a “circling the drain” effect.


Image-stimulus-money No, the answer to this recession is not to be found in monetary or fiscal policy. It lies in ending the stranglehold our artificial scarcity of energy has on us. We need to stop thinking of energy as something we burn, start thinking of it as something we harvest, and create policies that fit this way of thinking.

We've seen the pattern several times. The economy starts to grow, oil prices start to rise, the economy starts to contract and oil prices go down again. Growth is impossible so long as it is tied to a commodity whose owners can soak up all growth's profits.

A renewable stimulus is called for.

Think about all the economic benefits you get when you replace a gallon of oil demand. You get the jobs made in creating the resource. You get the extra energy. You also take a gallon of demand out of the system, permanently.

Because America consumes one-quarter of the world's oil while having just 4% of the world's people, we have more of this “free energy” available to us than any other nation. If our industry and lifestyles were as efficient as those of Europe, oil might be half the price it is now, because supply-and-demand in that market are on a knife edge.

The problem in both reducing demand for oil and increasing supply for alternatives is that it requires capital, and by definition capital is in short supply during recessions. The obvious answer is to re-deploy capital, through incentives that make investing in reduced energy use more profitable and investing in fossil fuels less profitable.

Goretax We can start by equalizing prices.

Oil lobbyists have succeeded, with the connivance of people like Al Gore, of scuttling this by calling it a “carbon tax.” It's not. The fossil fuel industries already have their infrastructure in place, while the renewable industries do not. The fossil fuel industries routinely ignore the external costs of what they do, while the renewable industries must.

The amount of government subsidy going to fossil fuels is actually quite staggering. Lease rates on federal land are incredibly small. Environmental regulation is incredibly lax. There is no tax paid on the pollution these industries spew out at every stage of their process. We've fought numerous wars to guarantee access to the resource.

Do I really need to go on?

Charging these costs back to the industry, making the price we pay for fossil fuels fit the cost of fossil fuel development, will generate enormous amounts of capital for both the saving of existing energy and the creation of renewable energy. But we can't even have that discussion as long as it's called a “carbon tax.”

So call it what it really is, price equalization. We can eliminate all current government incentives to renewable industries if we just charge fossil fuel industries the full cost of what they are doing.

Obviously these increases have to be phased-in, but phasing-in is easy. In exchange eliminate all renewable incentives. Charge people the full price for all the energy they consume and renewable energy becomes cheap, while technology that saves energy becomes dirt cheap.

Sunlight-hands We waste fossil fuel energy routinely. Most homes and businesses aren't insulated as they should be. People drive many miles back-and-forth to work, alone in SUVs. Many of our appliances waste energy when they're plugged-in to the wall, and turned off. Our suburbs are designed strictly for the use of cars, and many people have to get into cars to go anywhere thanks to deliberately inefficient urban design.

We know all this is true. But we don't even think about it because fossil fuel energy has been kept artificially cheap. Change that and you will get a stimulus.

Every gallon of oil we burn generates merely the cost imposed on the buyer of that energy, which is subsidized by our refusal to deal with the external costs of that oil. Every gallon of oil we save creates work, creates energy, and lowers demand for fossil fuels. So does every gallon of oil we create harvesting the energy abundance around us.

The Sun shines. The wind blows. The tides roll. We live on a molten rock. There is no energy shortage. We just need a renewable stimulus to start growing again.

Tags: coalfossil fuelsnatural gasoilrecessionrecoveryrenewable energysolar energyThe War Against OilU.S. economywind energy
Previous Post

Renewable Energy Should Not Be PR

Next Post

Google is Not at War

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
Google is Not at War

Google is Not at War

Comments 12

  1. Gerard says:
    14 years ago

    So… you really mean is that you want to tax people who are productive and working (which is not you), to spend on your feel good dreams?
    When do you get a job, start earning money, pay taxes so that also other people in society can benefit from your contributions?
    Painful reality, I know. But this is just to show that you are a hypocrite. Get a job first. Pay taxes first. Then talk

    Reply
  2. Gerard says:
    14 years ago

    So… you really mean is that you want to tax people who are productive and working (which is not you), to spend on your feel good dreams?
    When do you get a job, start earning money, pay taxes so that also other people in society can benefit from your contributions?
    Painful reality, I know. But this is just to show that you are a hypocrite. Get a job first. Pay taxes first. Then talk

    Reply
  3. Dana Blankenhorn says:
    14 years ago

    I have a job. I pay taxes. I always have.
    I have earned my living as a successful freelance writer since 1983, except for one small stint at CMP Media. In some years I have made six-figures. In other years I have made nothing. That's the way it is with the market. You manage your money conservatively, and you keep working even when no money is coming in.
    I currently work about 8 hours a day. Have since I graduated college. Currently I'm doing well at Seeking Alpha, and working on a novel as well as advising some start-ups.
    The nonsense that you need a "job" to earn a living has been a falsehood for decades. No entrepreneur has a "job" and we depend on such people for growth. And journalists have freelanced successfully since the 19th century.
    Dana

    Reply
  4. Dana Blankenhorn says:
    14 years ago

    I have a job. I pay taxes. I always have.
    I have earned my living as a successful freelance writer since 1983, except for one small stint at CMP Media. In some years I have made six-figures. In other years I have made nothing. That's the way it is with the market. You manage your money conservatively, and you keep working even when no money is coming in.
    I currently work about 8 hours a day. Have since I graduated college. Currently I'm doing well at Seeking Alpha, and working on a novel as well as advising some start-ups.
    The nonsense that you need a "job" to earn a living has been a falsehood for decades. No entrepreneur has a "job" and we depend on such people for growth. And journalists have freelanced successfully since the 19th century.
    Dana

    Reply
  5. Joaquin says:
    14 years ago

    Wow, what article was Gerald reading? I couldn’t agree more with the premise of transforming our view of energy consumption as a resource and to level the cost structure from sources so as to spur renewable energy use. We are today, with wind energy, able to deliver electricity at a competitive price to coal plants without the excess waste of coal ash and contaminents to the air.
    The next generation should inherit a better perspective of use rather than ignorant consumption without a realization of cause and effect. It is a shame that the U.S. is comprised of more Geralds than Danas.

    Reply
  6. Joaquin says:
    14 years ago

    Wow, what article was Gerald reading? I couldn’t agree more with the premise of transforming our view of energy consumption as a resource and to level the cost structure from sources so as to spur renewable energy use. We are today, with wind energy, able to deliver electricity at a competitive price to coal plants without the excess waste of coal ash and contaminents to the air.
    The next generation should inherit a better perspective of use rather than ignorant consumption without a realization of cause and effect. It is a shame that the U.S. is comprised of more Geralds than Danas.

    Reply
  7. Gerard says:
    14 years ago

    Nice try Dana. You’re unemployed and living off your good wife’s money. Your own words. Sure you may say you’re ‘doing’ something but you’re not earning enough money to live off it. You’re a leech.
    It’s funny. What happened was that when you were confronted with the truth, that you’re a lazy hippie who can’t (well, doesn’t want) to work, you get all ‘manly’ and starts spewing vague things like you’re contributing to society (after all). You’ve reached level 2: liar. All that to prove you’re man?
    By the way, how’s that Messiah working out for ya! More unemployment!

    Reply
  8. Gerard says:
    14 years ago

    Nice try Dana. You’re unemployed and living off your good wife’s money. Your own words. Sure you may say you’re ‘doing’ something but you’re not earning enough money to live off it. You’re a leech.
    It’s funny. What happened was that when you were confronted with the truth, that you’re a lazy hippie who can’t (well, doesn’t want) to work, you get all ‘manly’ and starts spewing vague things like you’re contributing to society (after all). You’ve reached level 2: liar. All that to prove you’re man?
    By the way, how’s that Messiah working out for ya! More unemployment!

    Reply
  9. Jim Robertson says:
    14 years ago

    Maybe “growth” isn’t what we need.
    Perhaps we need to learn to co-operate with the natural world.
    Unfortunately that means the entire “growth” based economy must reset first..

    Reply
  10. Jim Robertson says:
    14 years ago

    Maybe “growth” isn’t what we need.
    Perhaps we need to learn to co-operate with the natural world.
    Unfortunately that means the entire “growth” based economy must reset first..

    Reply
  11. Dana Blankenhorn says:
    14 years ago

    Where you got your personal hatred of me is a mystery, but your charge is completely unfounded.
    I have worked steadily since graduating from grad school in 1978. As my wife of 33 years will attest. Many years I have been the family’s chief breadwinner. Other years I have been its caretaker. Whatever the market was doing, I worked. I’m a writer. That’s what we do.
    I don’t know what you do, except sit around trying to personally discredit anyone who dares disagree with your failed ideology, but I suggest you get yourself a job and have a nice cup of STFU.
    I’ve left you post here because I’m a nice guy, but this last from you is the last. You walk into my home and assault me, I turn the other cheek and you assault me again. You’re a very sick puppy.

    Reply
  12. Dana Blankenhorn says:
    14 years ago

    Where you got your personal hatred of me is a mystery, but your charge is completely unfounded.
    I have worked steadily since graduating from grad school in 1978. As my wife of 33 years will attest. Many years I have been the family’s chief breadwinner. Other years I have been its caretaker. Whatever the market was doing, I worked. I’m a writer. That’s what we do.
    I don’t know what you do, except sit around trying to personally discredit anyone who dares disagree with your failed ideology, but I suggest you get yourself a job and have a nice cup of STFU.
    I’ve left you post here because I’m a nice guy, but this last from you is the last. You walk into my home and assault me, I turn the other cheek and you assault me again. You’re a very sick puppy.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

The Coming Labor War

The Insanity of Wealth

May 7, 2025
Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

May 5, 2025
Make America Dutch Again

Make America Dutch Again

April 30, 2025
Bikes and Trains

Opa Fiets is Depressed

April 29, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved