• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home futurism

The 1966 Game: Who Is Reagan Now

by Dana Blankenhorn
May 10, 2006
in futurism, Games, history, politics, The 1966 Game
2
0
SHARES
1
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Reaganronald1966
This is the big one.

First, let’s remember a few facts about 1966. Ronald Reagan was nobody, well nearly nobody. He was an out-of-work actor who had hosted a TV show, "Death Valley Days," and made one speech of importance. In that speech, he nominated a man for President who would get just 39% of the vote, still a record low for a two-person election.

No, in 1966 Reagan was just a promise, nothing more.

So the answer of "Who’s Reagan Now" is not a working politician. Can’t be. But it still has to be someone with a high public profile, and a known reputation for endorsing liberal causes. It’s someone who would best represent a New Thesis, a hope rather than a reality.

So who’s Reagan now?

Oprah
Surprised?

Ronald Reagan was transformed from an actor into a politician by several California billionaires, who trained him up in the way he should go.

Oprah Winfrey is her own billionaire.

Just as millions of Americans were ready, even in 1966, to march into hell supporting Reaganism, so I guarantee there are an equal number of Democrats today who would whoop and work like stink to make Oprah Winfrey the President of the United States. (Only they’d call it Oprahism, not Winfreyism.)

How crazy is it? In the movie "Back to the Future" the character played by Christopher Lloyd asks Michael J. Fox, "Who’s President in the future?" Fox answers Reagan. Snorts Lloyd, "Who’s Vice President? Jerry Lewis?"

It’s insane, really. So was the idea of President Ronald Reagan, the Greatest American of the 20th Century (according to recent  polls), in 1966.

But is it insane? Would Oprah Winfrey really be a bad President? Worse than Reagan could have seemed then? Really? She is a proven businesswoman. She knows the medium. She’s passionate about issues she cares about.

She could actually do it. Which is more than anyone was willing to say about Reagan, at this time in 1966.

So who’s next? We’ve already covered Hubert Humphrey, Nelson Rockefeller, Reagan, Bobby Kennedy. (We know who LBJ is — the lame duck Texas President who got us into a war he can’t get us out of.)

We haven’t played Eugene McCarthy yet. Remember. This is a member of the incumbent party, one who believes in the current Thesis, who is willing to extend that Thesis toward solving our current problems, and willing to take on the President in order to do it. Today he’s a relatively quiet, back-bench member of the majority, little dreaming of the long strange trip history has in store for him. (Or her. Let’s not give it away.)

Next week, on The 1966 Game.

Tags: 1966historical parallelsOprahRonald ReaganThe 1966 GameWho is Reagan Now
Previous Post

Why a Political Fight for Open Source?

Next Post

Richard Cohen and the Greasy Pole

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post

Richard Cohen and the Greasy Pole

Comments 2

  1. Jesse Kopelman says:
    19 years ago

    Man, Oprah could be a fun President. Instead of giving Tennant a medal, she would have brow beaten him on national television for lying “to” her about Iraqi WMD.

    Reply
  2. Jesse Kopelman says:
    19 years ago

    Man, Oprah could be a fun President. Instead of giving Tennant a medal, she would have brow beaten him on national television for lying “to” her about Iraqi WMD.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

The Coming Labor War

The Insanity of Wealth

May 7, 2025
Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

Tachtig Jaar Van Vrede en Vrijheid

May 5, 2025
Make America Dutch Again

Make America Dutch Again

April 30, 2025
Bikes and Trains

Opa Fiets is Depressed

April 29, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved