• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home A-Clue

The Core and the Edge

by Dana Blankenhorn
March 21, 2014
in A-Clue, Broadband, Broadband Gap, business models, business strategy, Communications Policy, Current Affairs, e-commerce, economics, entertainment, futurism, innovation, intellectual property, Internet, investment, law, network neutrality, Personal, regulation, Television, Web/Tech
16
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Think of this as Volume 18, Number 12 of the newsletter I have written weekly since March, 1997. Enjoy.


Tim berners-lee knightThe IN in the word Internet stands for interactive. (Right, Sir Tim Berners-Lee, whose 1989 paper set the terms for today's World Wide Web.)

The assumption of its designers was that the Internet would be a two-way network, that as many bits would flow in one direction as the other. Peering, the original financial agreement underlying today's Internet, is based on this assumption.

The Internet, in other words, was not designed to be TV. It was not designed to be a passive medium, as something you watch, or read, or listen to. We already had such media. The Internet was designed to be something you interacted with.

That's not how things are working out in our time. The Internet is becoming TV, is becoming something you watch, or read, or listen to. The bits are mostly flowing in one direction, from the core to the edge of the network. Most of the technical standards underlying consumer Internet traffic, like DSL and DOCSIS, are designed to let bits flow faster downstream than upstream, on the assumption that more bits would do that.


Gordon_MooreThere are also different cost structures at the core of the Internet and on the edge. When you improve something in the core, that improvement goes to everyone at once. It's relatively cheap. Changing the edge means changing all client devices at the edge, and it costs more. Improving a fiber link can be as simple as changing the diodes at each end of it. Improving local networks may mean rolling trucks, and digging up streets.

The core of the Internet can take advantage of Moore's Law. The edge does not.

This is true for non-Internet networks as well. Payment networks are ready to take EMV or chip cards. They were improved by programmers from central points. Issuing banks, however, have to send out over 1 billion chip cards, at a price 10 times greater than mag-stripe cards, to cut the $5 billion in fraud on that $4.4 trillion market by, maybe, half. And merchants have to install EMV terminals, and cash registers. They also have to train people in new check-out procedures. It's expensive.

Internet coreAll things being equal, all things are not equal on the Internet. Not as they relate to costs. And not as it relates to benefits, either. Core services like Facebook and Google are much better investments than edge services like AT&T. Core services are what people want from the Internet. Edge services are mere means to that end.

As a result of all this, improvements in the Internet's core have outstripped those at its edge. Core services complain that there isn't enough speed at the edge, that consumers can't get everything they want to deliver, that U.S. broadband is falling behind that in other countries. They're right.

When the edge services try to fight back against this economic reality, they are accused of violating “net neutrality,” the principle that people should be able to access any legal service they care to, without discrimination. They are doing just that, because they can't make a single agreement with the core, only with specific interests inside that core.

Bt logoBeyond trying to sign new agreements with core services, edge services are also fighting back by buying “content” services that are delivered from the core, but desired at the edge. When BT won the rights to broadcast Premier League football matches, and then the Champions League, that was an example of the edge controlling the core. When Comcast and other cable companies began their “TV Everywhere” effort, in which their subscribers could access cable programming from other devices, this was also an example of the edge seeking to control the core.

A few generations ago, regulators fought this kind of vertical integration. The fall of the Hollywood studios is directly attributed to Washington's demand that theaters be divested by studios in the early 1950s. Without that integration, the studios withered. When they came back a generation later, as TV networks, and demanded the right to own their own programming, Washington gave in.

Facebook comcast logoWhen NBC broadcasts a show, or a game, Comcast writes a check to itself. When this programming is offered through Comcast as an ISP, Comcast writes a check to itself. Vertical integration is very profitable to the edge, and it's possible because the capital costs of the edge make programming assets vulnerable to purchase. It also limits consumer choice. It's a direct assault on net neutrality.

The fact is, neither side is being honest about the issue. Core services aren't admitting to their financial advantages, over the edge. Edge services aren't acknowledging the inherent conflict of interest in owning content.

Consumers are being whipsawed by rhetoric from both sides, and policy makers in Washington are suffering from the same thing.

But we don't have to be. It is time to acknowledge that there are cost differences between the edge and the core. It is time to build business models acknowledging this cost difference, and enabling improvements in edge performance the core needs in order to grow. But it's also time for edge services to stop lying about what they're doing. They are violating “net neutrality.” They are trying to control Internet consumer behavior through their control of vital infrastructure.

The edge deserves to be paid. But the Internet deserves to be free.  

Tags: cableconsumer InternetInternetInternet policyInternet Service ProvidersISPsnet neutralitytelephony
Previous Post

The 1938 Game

Next Post

This Hamiltonian World

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Next Post
This Hamiltonian World

This Hamiltonian World

Comments 16

  1. Cable And Internet Deals says:
    5 years ago

    What may you recommend about your publish that you simply made some days ago…

    Reply
  2. Cable And Internet Deals says:
    5 years ago

    What may you recommend about your publish that you simply made some days ago…

    Reply
  3. Internetserviceproviders says:
    5 years ago

    As what is good for the gander is good for the goose, why not let good old Ephraim Inoni benefit from this
    very same largesse? His account published a few days ago should pay off his debt without much loss of sleep.

    Reply
  4. Internetserviceproviders says:
    5 years ago

    As what is good for the gander is good for the goose, why not let good old Ephraim Inoni benefit from this
    very same largesse? His account published a few days ago should pay off his debt without much loss of sleep.

    Reply
  5. Internet Providers says:
    5 years ago

    There Is Obviously a lot to know about this. I suppose you made Some Great points in the Feature also.

    Reply
  6. Internet Providers says:
    5 years ago

    There Is Obviously a lot to know about this. I suppose you made Some Great points in the Feature also.

    Reply
  7. Best Deals In Internet says:
    5 years ago

    Thank you very much for the information provided! I was looking for this data for a long time, but I was not able to find the trusted source.

    Reply
  8. Best Deals In Internet says:
    5 years ago

    Thank you very much for the information provided! I was looking for this data for a long time, but I was not able to find the trusted source.

    Reply
  9. Cable Tv Internet Providers says:
    5 years ago

    It’s really beautiful work.Thanks for this kind of stuff.I mean I am totally impressed.
    Hope to see more updated work here. I have to say, it is very informative.

    Reply
  10. Cable Tv Internet Providers says:
    5 years ago

    It’s really beautiful work.Thanks for this kind of stuff.I mean I am totally impressed.
    Hope to see more updated work here. I have to say, it is very informative.

    Reply
  11. DirecTV Internet says:
    5 years ago

    Thank you for providing eye opening article thank you for sharing its really informative article…

    Reply
  12. DirecTV Internet says:
    5 years ago

    Thank you for providing eye opening article thank you for sharing its really informative article…

    Reply
  13. Cableinternet-deals says:
    5 years ago

    If we pay attention to God’s creation, it is forecasting great changes ….
    and most of it will not be to our liking! But I guess what upsets me the most is the arrogance of man,
    who thinks that he can improve on what God brought forth out of His supremacy and sovereignty.
    That arrogance will beget judgment.

    Reply
  14. Cableinternet-deals says:
    5 years ago

    If we pay attention to God’s creation, it is forecasting great changes ….
    and most of it will not be to our liking! But I guess what upsets me the most is the arrogance of man,
    who thinks that he can improve on what God brought forth out of His supremacy and sovereignty.
    That arrogance will beget judgment.

    Reply
  15. Home Internet Service says:
    5 years ago

    The overall look of your website is excellent, let alone the content!

    Reply
  16. Home Internet Service says:
    5 years ago

    The overall look of your website is excellent, let alone the content!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

A Retailing Ghost Story

A Retailing Ghost Story

November 28, 2023
AGI is the Lie of the Year

AGI is the Lie of the Year

November 27, 2023
Shadow of a Doubt

Shadow of a Doubt

November 25, 2023
Reconsidering OpenAI

Reconsidering OpenAI

November 21, 2023
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved