Think of this as Volume 16, Number 10 of A-Clue.com, the online newsletter I've written since 1997. Enjoy.
With natural gas prices having tanked, and the President being given stick on the campaign trail over high gas prices and failed subsidies at Solyndra and elsewhere, it may be hard to see that the War Against Oil is being won.
But it is.
The War Against Oil is a long-term project, begun some years ago, meant to wean the market from its dependence on fossil fuels and create a new era of sustainable abundance. It is at the heart of today's politics, oil interests having taken command of our politics 12 years ago and retaining an absolute stranglehold on the Republican Party. But this is, in the end, an economic struggle, and what ultimately matters is cost.
Solyndra, and the other loan guarantee recipients who have struggled, are in fact symbols of this war being won. They failed because their low-cost technologies could not compete in the marketplace, against lower-cost technologies. Because of the pressure created by companies like Solyndra, solar panel production costs are now below $1/watt, and they continue to decline.
The ultimate goal is a cost of roughly 50 cents/watt, which would make solar energy the cheap energy for much of the electric grid. It's already the obvious choice where the grid doesn't exist (which is most of the world), and it can be delivered where it is produced, a huge cost advantage.
Right now the market is dominated by a single technology, polysilicon, and by a single country, China. But the opportunity is so huge that American innovators, working with organic compounds, mirrors, and rare earths, are poised to blow through the current cost floor over the next four years and achieve real grid parity. And it's that point that is key here, because once you're competing effectively on price with fossil fuels, all you need do is scale profitable production to knock those fuels out of the market.
The current reduction in subsidies, in Germany, England, and elsewhere, sounds like a defeat but is in fact a victory. Because these subsidies were always based on cost, and as costs for solar fall it's natural that subsidies will fall with them. Remember, the goal isn't subsidized power, but lower-cost power, without use of fossil fuels.
Wind is problematic. Over the long run, I don't think it competes with solar, because its costs fall only arithmetically, not geometrically as tech costs do. But wind is highly reliable. What's most important about it is that it has gotten buy-in from utility companies who have found markets for the resulting power, with “green credits” that draw companies like Google, Kohl's and Starbucks into paying subsidies so government doesn't have to, and which gives them an appetite for green power.
All of which brings us to cars.
Recent Comments