• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home Current Affairs

Hate Speech Shows Weakness

by Dana Blankenhorn
June 10, 2006
in Current Affairs, history, political philosophy, politics
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Glennbeck
Political rhetoric is like a drug.

A sure sign of excess, then,  is when rhetoric becomes crack.

One regular habit of liberal blogs is bemoaning the harshness of right-wing rhetoric. It’s hard to have a policy discussion with someone who is dehumanizing you.

But an appetite for that kind of rhetoric is yet-another indication of excess, a condition in which a Political Thesis has exceeded its reach and is about to fall. In other words, harsh rhetoric is a good thing for those it’s directed at — it shows they are winning.

Harsh rhetoric always exists, of course. What makes the difference is its popularity. Glenn Reynolds isn’t harsh enough for conservatives. They prefer Michelle Malkin. So that’s what the media gives them. 

Compare it to the left in the 1960s. They seemed to be getting their way, but this wasn’t good enough for so many, and thus we had SDS, the Black Panthers, the Weathermen. Each step left the far left increasingly marginalized. The right is going through a similar evolution right now. 

TV, which cares only about audience, notices this. You don’t need a majority to make a show, just a minority committed enough to tune in. So  in a time of excess they seek out  excessive speakers. Glenn Beck, for instance.   Calling Al Gore a "Nazi" is stupid, but it excites his audience. Same thing for Ann Coulter insulting the 9/11 widows.  Why is she allowed back on TV again-and-again? Ratings. Who’s cheering, and why? That’s the key.

None of this is to say liberals should not be outraged, or that they
should not fight back. It’s by fighting back in a principled manner
that you solidify support among those in the center, the people who
decide elections. The key, when the crisis comes, will be to have unity
among the non-haters, so we can build a politics of consensus.

Everything’s moving along just fine.

Tags: AmericablogAnn CoulterconservatismDailyKosGlenn BeckGlenn Reynoldshate speechliberalismMichelle Malkinpolitical rhetoric
Previous Post

This Week’s Clue: A Chinese Internet

Next Post

It Should Be Closer

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Next Post

It Should Be Closer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

Why Do I Hate Medill so Much?

Why Do I Hate Medill so Much?

December 4, 2023
Big AI, Little AI

AI and the Death of Writing

November 30, 2023
A Retailing Ghost Story

A Retailing Ghost Story

November 28, 2023
AGI is the Lie of the Year

AGI is the Lie of the Year

November 27, 2023
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved