Ever since the dot-coms, and then the Towers, came down, over a decade ago, corporations have given small investors the back of their hand.
(As always when I use The Monopoly Man as an illustration, I point you to the fine game produced by Hasbro.)
Hedge funds have arisen that squeeze out small profits on fast action, play with leverage, and take control of trends like social networking. Small players are not invited. This is how the 1% of the 1%, and the 1% of that group, kept their lead growing over the rest.
The result is that the best returns aren't available to you or me. Popular stocks cost hundreds of dollars (in the case of Berkshire Hathaway BRK.A many thousands of dollars) per share. Entire booms (like social networking) start to bust before small investors can even get a taste. Instead we get the investment equivalent of mush, ETFs and mutual funds with limited risk but very limited return.
I think this is about to change.
One reason is the social networking crash, which has mostly happened out of sight and burned some very big checking accounts. With smart money getting suspicious, investment bankers are going to look for investment where they can get it.
Another reason is political. The atmospherics of giving all the best opportunities to a handful of people are bad. Spreading things out, even out toward the 5% of Americans with “mad money” to invest, is almost populist.
A third reason is technological. The Internet makes it very, very easy for small investors to move money around. Lots of people with small accounts still means a lot of money. Sites like Seeking Alpha give small investors the courage to play.
Recent Comments