Newspapers have reached the desperate stage of their death spiral, the point where they're looking for government bail-outs.
In the case of the financial industry there was a case to be made that letting AIG and Citigroup fail would cost more than propping them up. In the case of the auto industry there's a case to be made that we'll at least get the money back.
There is no such case to be made for newspapers.
What they're looking for is a "
tweak" to the copyright laws that would bar linking to copyrighted material without consent. What they're seeking is the destruction of the Internet.
The same argument holds for the idea that content should be exclusive to its source for 24 hours. If you can't link to it, content does not exist. I'm amazed people like
Connie Schultz manage to breathe they're so stupid.
The Internet is based on links. Content you can't Google does not exist. We have learned this before with the news industry when it tried to hide its content behind paid firewalls and registration systems.
It didn't work.
The industry now knows it needs links. It just wants to extract monopoly rents for them. Hey, I want a pony.
Any Senator or Congressman who
stands up for this nonsense needs to be slapped down, hard. Can you imagine the cost of this to schools, to libraries, to universities? Can you imagine the bureaucratic cost of tracking this free money? And I guarantee it will go only to a few politically-connected news barons, people like Rupert Murdoch and
Carlos Slim.
Recent Comments