My Photo

Tip Jar

Change is good

Tip Jar

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 08/2003

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Snap

  • Snap

What's with Dana?

    follow me on Twitter

    Google Analytics

    • Google Analytics

    Blogads

    • Put your ad here with Blogads

    Adify

    • Adify Skyscraper

    « Signs of Recognition | Main | The World is NOT Coming to an End »

    August 02, 2006

    AOL and Stephen Colbert's Elephant

    Aol_old_new I guess I should blog something about AOL going all-free to broadband subscribers.

    Play it, Jon:

    Ooh can you feel the same
    Ooh ya gotta love the pain
    Ooh it looks like rain
    again
    Yeah feel it comin' in
    The mountains win 
    again 

    It has been more than a decade since I had an AOL account. I had to have one then in order to post stuff from NetGuide, a magazine I was writing for at the time.

    NetGuide and AOL had a lot in common. Both were based on the idea that the Internet would be something like TV. They assumed that "brands" would dominate, the same old brands. And the same old celebrities.

    Eventually, those concerns do bubble to the top of the stack. Paris Hilton, for instance, has 10 times the number of hits as DailyKos. But traffic and even links are not the be-all and end-all of Internet influence.

    This is something Big Media has yet to understand. It's something, in fact, they continue to make fun of.


    Stephencolbertwhitehousecorrespondentsdi Consider Stephen Colbert's word for yesterday, wikiality. This is reality as defined by Wikipedia. Colbert seized on the idea that Wikipedia entries are democratic -- anyone can make them, and anyone can edit them. Thus, he told his audience, they could go to the Wikipedia entry for the word elephant, write that their numbers in Africa were increasing (they're actually down 90% in 10 years) and that would change reality.

    Well, it didn't. Wikipedia has long had protections in place to prevent this kind of vandalism. Yes, anyone can get in and write. No, not everything you write will stay. No, not everyone who writes can keep writing -- vandals are detected and stopped.

    This is just one example of the kind of reality denial AOL has always gone through. It was a great set of Internet training wheels 10 years ago, but no one needs training wheels anymore -- the Web is now 17.  In terms of real popularity, I began working on this medium almost 12 years ago. Folks are experienced enough with this medium to deal with its problems. They don't need big brother watching over them.

    Not that big brother is ever going to be convinced. But we just don't need AOL.

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451da3169e200d834d9eb2e69e2

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference AOL and Stephen Colbert's Elephant:

    Comments

    BrightAds

    • BrightAds by Kanoodle

    Cafepress

    • CafePress