What is the Internet?
David Reed asked this question on a mailing list recently and it sort-of brought me up short:
What is the Internet?
His point was that the Internet is not the transport. In other words, no matter what Comcast or Verizon or AT&T do, they do not and cannot "own" the Internet. No one can.
The more I thought about it, the deeper the answer got. The Internet is not the servers or services connected to it. The Internet is not even (really) the people who use it, who provide content or download that content. And it is not the content, either.
The Internet is a larger, greater, more important result. It is Version 1.0 of a Global Mind. That is the result of connecting all these servers, all this knowledge, all these opinions, or making it available to anyone whose network can access a TCP/IP link that, eventually, can reach a DNS address.
When you think about the Internet in this way, a sort of What the Bleep model, your priorities for it shift just a little bit. Maybe more than a little bit.
- Who cares if sex or hate are there? Are they not part of the human condition?
- Your success as a society depends on your ability to contribute and learn from this resource. It becomes a higher priority.
- A public property model becomes imperative.
Anything which is kept off the Internet is no longer part of the group discussion. This does not mean it is not discussed. This means the subject goes into the dark recesses of the human soul, the secret places no government or psychologist can reach, the animal mind where death resides. Do we want that?
Given this model of the Internet, how can we let any company control what is done by its users? How can there not be net neutrality -- it's a natural component of human freedom we're talking about now, not your balance sheet.
Given this model of the Internet, we must educate our children about its dangers. But we can't deny it to them, any more than we can keep them from growing up.
Given this model of the Internet, it becomes everyone's business to gain and keep the best possible access to it, no matter where we happen to be.
Given this model of the Internet, the adventure has barely begun.


I think a lot of people think the Internet's easy to define. I think, rather, many view it as the problems to which net neutrality would be the solution are difficult to define.
Posted by: Raphy | March 24, 2006 at 02:46 PM
Dana, you should really be watching Ghost in the Shell: Standalone Complex on the Cartoon Network (12:30 am Sunday, with some reruns and Comcast VOD availability). It shows some interesting implications of living in an "Always On" world.
Posted by: Jesse Kopelman | March 24, 2006 at 06:11 PM