My Photo

Tip Jar

Change is good

Tip Jar

May 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 08/2003

Blogads

  • Put your ad here with Blogads

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Snap

  • Snap

Cafepress

  • CafePress

ClustrMaps

  • ClustrMaps

BrightAds

  • BrightAds by Kanoodle

What's with Dana?

    follow me on Twitter

    Google Analytics

    • Google Analytics

    « A Champion for The Broadband Gap | Main | A Brief Sports Note »

    March 14, 2006

    How Wireless Can Kill The Bells

    There is a reason the Bells have sicced their friends on the idea of open spectrum.

    It can kill them.

    Some hints of how easily and quickly this could be done arrived in my inbox this morning.

    1. 802.11n, a 100 Mbps WiFi system using a technology called MIMO, was approved by an IEEE working group. What this means, as Brian White of The Wireless Report notes, is 100 Mbps WiFi on the shelves of your local store, at popular prices, as early as this Christmas.
    2. Bills were introduced to let unlicensed services ride the space between digital TV stations.
    3. Rome, Georgia is studying plans to install a WiFi cloud throughout the city. This movement to install WiFi is nationwide, it's coming from the ground up, and it's becoming harder-and-harder for the Bells to control.

    Ted_stevens What does this mean? For starters, it means people putting 100 MBps LANs in their living rooms, and wondering why their Internet is still so slow. In other words, it means demand for faster broadband than the cable operators and Bell companies are willing to provide.

    But the second proposal may be more important. The 802.11 bands are microwave frequencies, spaced between 2.4-5.8 GHz. TV stations broadcast at much lower frequencies. The lower the frequency the further the wave can travel, the wider the coverage area, the fewer repeaters you need to cover, say, Alaska. (Ted Stevens of Alaska is the Senate sponsor. He is very, very powerful. He almost won The Daily Show Coot-Off!)

    Remember too that WiFi standards are backward-compatible. All 802.11 set-ups will be able to use systems like the one Rome, Georgia wants to build. As WiFi becomes a standard part in PCs and other devices, it becomes harder-and-harder not to justify support for it.

    So where do we go from here?

    WiMax does not specify frequencies. It is an enabling technology. If you can put WiMax technology on these low frequencies, you can backhaul wireless cable over long distances, with few repeaters, little loss, and at low cost.

    What the Bells own is the "last mile" or the "first mile" -- the link between the customer and the outer reaches of the wired network. If you can get WiFi signals to a WiMax or other "wireless cable" trunk, then use that connection to reach a competitive fiber, the Bells are done.

    They know this. They will fight the proposal tooth and nail. It's up to you to make sure they lose.

    TrackBack

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/2773/4452612

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How Wireless Can Kill The Bells:

    » Net Neutrality Debate Continues from ReveNews - Brad Waller
    After I first wrote about the threat of losing net neutrality in January and then wrote about it's ally in the Senate, activity dies down. It's back with a great article on ClickZ and another in Business Week. Rebecca Lieb... [Read More]

    Comments

    Post a comment

    If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In